Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Masculinizing Chest Reconstruction in Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals: An Analysis of Epidemiology, Surgical
Nicholas G Cuccolo1,2, Christine O Kang1,2, Elizabeth R Boskey3,4
1Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Background:
Chest reconstruction ('top surgery') is an important component of transition in the transmasculine population that can substantially improve gender incongruence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographic characteristics, surgical technique, and postoperative outcomes following transmasculine chest surgery.
Methods:
Using ICD codes, we identified all cases of gender-affirming transmasculine chest surgery from the ACS NSQIP database (2010-2017). CPT codes were used to categorize patients by reconstructive modality: reduction versus mastectomy (± free nipple grafting [FNG]). Univariate analysis was conducted to assess for differences in demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Multivariable regression analysis was used to control for confounders.
Results:
A total of 755 cases were identified, of whom 591 (78.3%) were mastectomies and 164 (21.7%) were reductions. No significant differences were noted in terms of age or BMI. Mastectomies had shorter operative times, but similar length of stay compared to reductions. Rates of postoperative complications were low, with 4.7% (n = 28) of mastectomies and 3.7% (n = 6) of reductions experiencing at least one all-cause complications. Postoperative complication rates were not statistically different between mastectomy with (3.4%) and without (5.6%) FNG. After controlling for confounders, there was no difference in terms of risk of all-cause complications between reduction and mastectomy, with or without FNG.
Conclusion:
Mastectomy and reduction mammaplasty are both safe procedures for chest reconstruction in the transmasculine population. These results may be used to encourage shared decision making between patient and surgeon such that the reconstructive modality of choice best aligns with the desired aesthetic outcome.
Level Of Evidence Iv:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
More Related Videos
11:06Subretinal Implantation of RPE on a Carrier in Minipigs: Guidelines for Preoperative Preparations, Surgical Techniques, and Postoperative Care
Published on: November 11, 2022
08:01Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
Published on: August 24, 2018
Related Concept Videos
01:24Flail Chest-I
Flail chest is a severe and potentially life-threatening condition characterized by the fracture of three or more adjacent ribs in multiple places. It is most commonly caused by direct impacts and trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents or injuries from a steering wheel impact. It can also occur due to falls in elderly individuals with osteoporosis, or assaults involving sharp objects.
Pathophysiology
The pathophysiology of flail chest is complex, involving fractures of...
01:26Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
01:24Chest Physiotherapy
Purpose
CPT is primarily used for patients with excessive bronchial secretions who have difficulty clearing...
01:26Introduction to Epidemiology
01:21Causality in Epidemiology
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...