Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

05:11
Measuring Hypopharyngeal Gland Acinus Size in Honey Bee Apis mellifera Workers
Published on: September 14, 2018
11.6K
Brain differences between social castes precede group formation in a primitively eusocial bee.
Sarah Pahlke1, Sarah Jaumann1, Marc A Seid2
1George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Die Naturwissenschaften
|August 29, 2019
Summary
Brain regions for learning and sensory integration are larger in solitary insect foundresses than in workers. This suggests neural investment in mushroom bodies precedes social group formation in primitively eusocial bees.
Area of Science:
- Neuroethology
- Insect social behavior
- Comparative neuroanatomy
Background:
- Social interactions significantly influence brain development.
- In primitively eusocial insects, the mushroom body (MB), crucial for sensory integration and learning, is larger in queens than workers.
- This size difference may stem from neural investment strategies or plastic responses to social environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether larger mushroom bodies in reproductives precede social group formation.
- To compare brain structures between solitary nest foundresses and workers in the primitively eusocial sweat bee Augochlorella aurata.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of brain structure sizes.
- Measurement of whole brain size, mushroom body size, optic lobe size, and antennal lobe size in foundresses and workers.
Main Results:
- Nest foundresses possess significantly larger mushroom bodies (MBs) than workers.
- No significant differences were observed in whole brain size or optic lobe size.
- Foundresses also exhibit larger antennal lobes compared to workers.
Conclusions:
- Increased neural investment in mushroom bodies occurs before the establishment of social groups.
- Larger MBs in foundresses may be attributed to factors like enhanced larval nutrition and absence of social aggression.
- These findings provide insights into the developmental plasticity of the brain in response to social and nutritional factors in primitively eusocial insects.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Scripts
10.2K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.2K
Social Proof
31.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.5K
Social Traps
26.3K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.3K
Social Facilitation
36.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.0K
Social Exchange Theory
39.5K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
39.5K
Social Loafing
38.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.9K

