Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Calculating fall rates: methodological concerns.

J M Morse1, R M Morse

  • 1Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

QRB. Quality Review Bulletin
|December 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The health care needs of southeast asian refugees.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
Same author

Preventing falls in the elderly.

Reflections on nursing leadership·2002
Same author

Mothers and their disabled children: refining the concept of normalization.

Health care for women international·2002
Same author

Appropriate use of pilot studies.

Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing·2002
Same author

The cultural sensitivity of grounded theory.

Qualitative health research·2001
Same author

Exploring the technical aspects of "fit" in qualitative research.

Qualitative health research·2001
Same journal

Screening and managing abdominal aortic aneurysms at the Ochsner Clinic: suggested algorithm and method of derivation. Department of Surgery and Ochsner Clinic Quality Assurance Committee.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
Same journal

A quality-of-care analysis of cascade iatrogenesis in frail elderly hospital patients.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
Same journal

Cascade or facade: focusing or obfuscating the pathogenesis of iatrogenesis?

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
Same journal

Ensuring excellence: reconceptualizing quality assurance, risk management, and utilization review.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
Same journal

Health reform principles for quality: recommendations for the congressional debate.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
Same journal

The critical path method alone does nothing to improve performance.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
See all related articles

Comparing patient fall rates is challenging due to varied calculation methods. This study evaluates common fall rate metrics and suggests standardized injury reporting for better healthcare comparisons.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Patient Safety Research
  • Clinical Metrics Analysis

Background:

  • Healthcare institutions face challenges comparing patient fall rates due to diverse reporting methodologies.
  • Existing metrics like patient fall rate and patients-at-risk lack standardization, hindering inter-institutional analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate common methods for calculating and reporting patient fall rates.
  • To explore alternative strategies, including the use of patient injury rates.
  • To propose recommendations for improved data comparability in patient fall incidents.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion and evaluation of two primary fall rate calculation methods: patient fall rate and number of patients-at-risk.
  • Analysis of alternative strategies focusing on patient injury rates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of existing data reporting practices in healthcare settings.

    • Main Results:

    • The variety of methods for determining patient fall rates complicates comparisons between healthcare facilities and units.
    • Patient fall rate and number of patients-at-risk are common but not universally comparable metrics.
    • Injury rates present a potential alternative but require standardized classification.

    Conclusions:

    • A standardized classification system for patient fall injuries is recommended.
    • Until a universal index for fall rates is adopted, diverse data reporting formats are necessary for comprehensive analysis.
    • Improved standardization is crucial for accurate benchmarking of patient safety outcomes.