Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Measurement of X-ray Beam Coherence along Multiple Directions Using 2-D Checkerboard Phase Grating
Published on: October 11, 2016
Comparison of CsI:Tl and Gd2 O2 S:Tb indirect flat panel detector x-ray imaging performance in front- and
Adrian Howansky1, Anastasiia Mishchenko2, A R Lubinsky1
1Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8460, USA.
Purpose:
The detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of indirect flat panel detectors (I-FPDs) is limited at higher x-ray energies (e.g., 100-140 kVp) by low absorption in their scintillating x-ray conversion layer. While increasing the thickness of the scintillator can improve its x-ray absorption efficiency, this approach is potentially limited by reduced spatial resolution and increased noise due to depth dependence in the scintillator's response to x rays. One strategy proposed to mitigate these deleterious effects is to irradiate the scintillator through the pixel sensor in a "back-irradiation" geometry. This work directly evaluates the impact of irradiation geometry on the inherent imaging performance of I-FPDs composed with columnar CsI:Tl and powder Gd2 O2 S:Tb (GOS) scintillators.
Methods:
A "bidirectional" FPD was constructed which allows scintillator samples to be interchangeably coupled with the detector's active matrix to compose an I-FPD. Radio-translucent windows in the detector's housing permit imaging in both "front-irradiation" (FI) and "back-irradiation" (BI) geometries. This test device was used to evaluate the impact of irradiation geometry on the x-ray sensitivity, modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and DQE of four I-FPDs composed using columnar CsI:Tl scintillators of varying thickness (600-1000 µm) and optical backing, and a Fast Back GOS screen. All experiments used an RQA9 x-ray beam.
Results:
Each I-FPD's x-ray sensitivity, MTF, and DQE was greater or equal in BI geometry than in FI. The I-FPD composed with CsI:Tl (1 mm) and an optically absorptive backing had the largest variation in sensitivity (17%) between FI and BI geometries. The detector composed with GOS had the largest improvement in limiting resolution (31%). Irradiation geometry had little impact on MTF(f) and DQE(f) measurements near zero frequency, however, the difference between FI and BI measurements generally increased with spatial frequency. The CsI:Tl scintillator with optically absorptive backing (1 mm) in BI geometry had the highest spatial resolution and DQE over all frequencies.
Conclusions:
Back irradiation may improve the inherent x-ray imaging performance of I-FPDs composed with CsI:Tl and GOS scintillators. This approach can be leveraged to improve tradeoffs between detector dose efficiency, spatial resolution and noise for higher energy x-ray imaging.
Related Concept Videos
10:39Measurement of X-ray Beam Coherence along Multiple Directions Using 2-D Checkerboard Phase Grating
06:51Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
07:54Preparing Adherent Cells for X-ray Fluorescence Imaging by Chemical Fixation
10:48PET and MRI Guided Irradiation of a Glioblastoma Rat Model Using a Micro-irradiator
11:40A Co-culture Method to Investigate the Crosstalk Between X-ray Irradiated Caco-2 Cells and PBMC
02:17Measuring TEER in X-ray-Irradiated Epithelial Cells Co-cultured With PBMCs

