Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Patients with Medically-refractory Essential Tremor
Published on: December 13, 2017
Re-emergent tremor provocation
Miguel Wilken1, Malco Rossi2, Alberto D Rivero3
1Movement Disorders, Neurology Department, FLENI, Montañeses 2325, C1428AQK, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Clinical Neurophysiology, Neurology Department, FLENI, Montañeses 2325, C1428AQK, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Introduction:
Rest and re-emergent tremor (RET) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are known to be markedly variable. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of tremor provocation on RET latency and variability.
Methods:
We performed a prospective observational study in 21 PD patients with RET. Evaluations were conducted by accelerometric analysis of hand movements with and without provocation by counting out loud backwards from 100, in the OFF state. Differences in RET pause duration, tremor power at peak frequency, root mean square (RMS) and slope of return of the tremor after the pause was measured. Inter- and intra-subject variability were also calculated.
Results:
RET pause duration showed a 75% decrease after provocation (p < 0.001), which led to zero in 52% of cases, as compared to 9% in unprovoked measurements (p < 0.001). Provocation also led to a 2.57 time increase in tremor power (p < 0.001), 1.37 time increase in RMS (p < 0.001) and 2.47 time increase in slope (p < 0.001). A significant decrease in inter-subject variability was also observed (p = 0.001).
Conclusion:
Tremor provocation led to RET amplitude increase, pause shortening, and variability decrease. Therefore, while provocation can be recommended for the evaluation of rest tremor in clinical practice, it might well annul its value for identifying the pause prior to re-emergent tremor.
Related Concept Videos
05:54MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Patients with Medically-refractory Essential Tremor
Emerging Adulthood
Guidelines in Case of a Laboratory Emergency
The most common laboratory emergencies include chemical spills, fire or explosion, electric shock, and personnel injuries. Most laboratory accidents occur due to poor planning or lack of attention. Therefore, it's always better to prevent accidents (being proactive) than having to take any actions during an emergency (being reactive). For example, always wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE) in the...
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Emergency Eyewash and Shower Stations
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) mandates that an emergency eyewash and shower station be easily accessible in all workplaces in which a person could be exposed to injurious and/or corrosive substances. Emergency eyewash and shower stations should be used in the case of a laboratory or workplace accident that involves the spilling of a harmful, possibly corrosive chemical onto the body or the splashing...
06:59A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings