Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Beta 2-microglobulin kinetics during haemofiltration.

J Floege1, M Wilks, S Shaldon

  • 1Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, FRG.

Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation : Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Time-dependent lipid profile inversely associates with mortality in hemodialysis patients - independent of inflammation/malnutrition.

Journal of internal medicine·2021
Same author

Heart failure in advanced chronic kidney disease: treatment rationale.

Herz·2021
Same author

[Immunoglobulin A nephropathy].

Der Internist·2019
Same author

[What is certain in the treatment of glomerulonephritis?]

Der Internist·2018
Same author

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping after Sports-Related Concussion.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2018
Same author

[Choosing wisely recommendations in nephrology].

Der Internist·2017

Beta 2-microglobulin removal during haemofiltration varies by membrane type. Highly permeable AN 69 and F 60 membranes show significant beta 2-microglobulin removal, nearly balancing generation in uraemic patients.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Clinical Chemistry

Background:

  • Beta 2-microglobulin (β2M) is a protein that accumulates in patients with end-stage renal failure.
  • Understanding β2M kinetics during haemofiltration is crucial for managing uraemic complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the kinetics and removal efficiency of beta 2-microglobulin (β2M) using different haemofilter membranes.
  • To compare the adsorption and removal of β2M by AN 69, Duo-Flux, and F 60 haemofilters.

Main Methods:

  • Seven patients with end-stage renal failure underwent haemofiltration using AN 69, Duo-Flux, and F 60 haemofilters.
  • Beta 2-microglobulin sieving coefficients and filter mass balance were analyzed.
  • Total β2M removal was calculated by summing adsorbed amounts and ultrafiltrate recovery.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The AN 69 haemofilter exhibited significant β2M adsorption and a negative mass balance error.
  • Total β2M removal was highest with AN 69 (393 ± 135 mg) and F 60 (316 ± 35 mg) compared to Duo-Flux (242 ± 79 mg).
  • All membranes showed an increase in calculated β2M distribution volume, suggesting water shifts.

Conclusions:

  • Highly permeable haemofilters like AN 69 and F 60 can effectively remove β2M, potentially balancing its generation in uraemic patients.
  • Water shifts during haemofiltration impact the precision of β2M kinetic studies.
  • Plasma level decrease is a limited index for assessing β2M removal due to water shifts.