Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026
01:22
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
846
Effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan vs Enalapril on Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection
Akshay S Desai1, Scott D Solomon1, Amil M Shah1
1Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA
|September 3, 2019
Summary
Sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly reduce central aortic stiffness in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared to enalapril. However, it showed greater reductions in left atrial volume and ventricular remodeling.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Sacubitril-valsartan is known to reduce cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- The mechanisms underlying these benefits may involve effects on hemodynamics and cardiac remodeling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of sacubitril-valsartan versus enalapril on central aortic stiffness and cardiac remodeling in patients with HFrEF.
- To compare changes in aortic characteristic impedance (Zc) and other cardiac remodeling markers between the two treatment groups.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 464 participants with HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤40%).
- Participants were randomized to receive either sacubitril-valsartan or enalapril for 12 weeks.
- The primary outcome was the change in central aortic stiffness (Zc); secondary outcomes included changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, ejection fraction, and various measures of cardiac remodeling.
Main Results:
- Sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly alter central aortic stiffness (Zc) compared to enalapril (treatment difference: -2.2 dyne × s/cm5; P=0.78).
- No significant difference was observed in the change of left ventricular ejection fraction between the groups.
- However, sacubitril-valsartan demonstrated significantly greater reductions in left atrial volume (P<.001), left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (P=.02), left ventricular end-systolic volume index (P=.045), and mitral E/e' ratio (P=.001) compared to enalapril.
Conclusions:
- Treatment with sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly reduce central aortic stiffness in patients with HFrEF when compared to enalapril.
- The observed improvements in left atrial volume and ventricular remodeling suggest potential mechanisms for sacubitril-valsartan's benefits in HFrEF.
- Further research may elucidate the comprehensive impact of sacubitril-valsartan on cardiovascular outcomes.