Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
Published on: December 20, 2024
Etiology and therapy indication for cochlear implantation in children with single-sided deafness : Retrospective
S L Cushing1,2,3, K A Gordon4,5,6, M Sokolov7,4,5
1Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Room 6103C Burton Wing, 555 University Avenue, M5G 1X8, Toronto, ON, Canada. sharon.cushing@sickkids.ca.
Objective:
The characteristics of children with single-sided deafness (SSD) who become candidates for unilateral cochlear implantation (uCI) were identified.
Study Design:
In all, 118 children with SSD presenting from 2013-2019 to a tertiary pediatric children's hospital were retrospectively assessed regarding candidacy for uCI.
Results:
Of the 118 children, 103 had completed uCI candidacy assessment, while 15 were undergoing this assessment at the time of review. More than half of children did not go on to implantation (63/103, 61%), with the 2 main reasons being (1) half (31/63) did not meet candidacy criteria for implantation, most commonly due to cochlear nerve aplasia/hypoplasia (31/82 who were assessed with MRI, 38%) and (2) families (30/103; 29%) declined participation in the surgical arm of the trial. The most common etiologies of SSD in the 37/103 (36%) children who both met candidacy and consented to implantation were congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV; 16/37, 43%), unknown (6/37, 16%), cochleovestibular anomaly and trauma (each 5/37, 14%).
Conclusions:
Many children with SSD who present for implant candidacy assessment do not ultimately receive uCI. Major factors contributing to noncandidacy are cochlear nerve aplasia and parental acceptance of the intervention. While approximately half of children with SSD in our cohort were candidates for implantation, only 1/3 of the total cohort proceeded with implantation with the main predictors of acceptability of this intervention being an etiology (i.e., cCMV) that carries risk of progressive deterioration in the better hearing ear or SSD that was sudden in onset. These findings provide important insight into this new population of cochlear implant users and the emerging acceptance of intervention in children with SSD.
Related Concept Videos
04:32Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
07:00Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
08:06Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
06:16The Miniature Pig: A Large Animal Model for Cochlear Implant Research
09:56Cochlear Implantation in the Guinea Pig
09:10Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

