Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020
Predicting Humphrey 10-2 visual field from 24-2 visual field in eyes with advanced glaucoma
Kenji Sugisaki1, Ryo Asaoka2, Toshihiro Inoue3
1Ophthalmology, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan sugisaktky@gmail.com.
Support vector regression (SVR) accurately predicts Humphrey Field Analyzer Central 10-2 (HFA 10-2) results from HFA 24-2 data in advanced glaucoma patients. This method offers a reliable way to estimate visual field sensitivity in the central isle.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Advanced glaucoma significantly impacts visual field sensitivity, particularly in the central macula.
- Accurate prediction of visual field test results is crucial for monitoring disease progression and treatment efficacy.
- Current methods for predicting detailed visual fields from broader tests have limitations in accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To predict Humphrey Field Analyzer Central 10-2 (HFA 10-2) test results using data from Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 (HFA 24-2) tests in eyes with advanced glaucoma.
- To evaluate the accuracy of various machine learning methods, including support vector regression (SVR), for this prediction task.
- To compare prediction accuracy against standard interpolation methods and test-retest variability.
Main Methods:
- Utilized training (175 eyes) and testing (44 eyes) datasets of patients with open advanced glaucoma (mean deviation ≤ -20 dB).
- Employed machine learning techniques, specifically SVR, to predict 68 total deviation (TD) values of HFA 10-2 test points from the innermost 16 HFA 24-2 test points.
- Calculated absolute prediction error (PredError) and compared it with bilinear interpolation (IP) and test-retest variability.
Main Results:
- The test-retest variability for HFA 10-2 results was 2.1±1.0 dB.
- Bilinear interpolation (IP) yielded a prediction error of 5.0±1.7 dB.
- Support vector regression (SVR) demonstrated the lowest prediction error at 4.0±1.5 dB, predicting retinal sensitivity within approximately 25% error.
Conclusions:
- Support vector regression (SVR) effectively predicts Humphrey Field Analyzer 10-2 (HFA 10-2) total deviation values from Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 (HFA 24-2) results in advanced glaucoma.
- The prediction error using SVR (approx. 25%) is approximately twice the test-retest variability, indicating a clinically relevant level of accuracy.
- This approach offers a viable method for estimating central visual field status in patients with advanced glaucoma using readily available HFA 24-2 data.
Related Concept Videos
07:45Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
05:05Ultrasound Cyclo Plasty in Eyes with Glaucoma
06:02Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI
07:11Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
10:49Visualizing Efficacy of Pesticides Against Disease Vector Mosquitoes in the Field
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...

