Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
Published on: September 7, 2018
Quantitative analysis of fetal magnetic resonance phantoms and recommendations for an anthropomorphic motion phantom
Michael Shulman1,2, Eunyoung Cho1,2, Bipin Aasi1,2
1Department of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada.
Objective:
To provide a review and quantitative analysis of the available fetal MR imaging phantoms.
Materials And Methods:
A literature search was conducted across Pubmed, Google Scholar, and Ryerson University Library databases to identify fetal MR imaging phantoms. Phantoms were graded on a semi-quantitative scale in regards to four evaluation categories: (1) anatomical accuracy in size and shape, (2) dielectric conductivity similar to the simulated tissue, (3) relaxation times similar to simulated tissue, and (4) physiological motion similar to fetal gross body, cardiovascular, and breathing motion. This was followed by statistical analysis to identify significant findings.
Results:
Seventeen fetal phantoms were identified and had an average overall percentage accuracy of 26%, with anatomical accuracy being satisfied the most (56%) and physiological motion the least (7%). Phantoms constructed using 3D printing were significantly more accurate than conventionally constructed phantoms.
Discussion:
Currently available fetal phantoms lack accuracy and motion simulation. 3D printing may lead to higher accuracy compared with traditional manufacturing. Future research needs to focus on properly simulating both fetal anatomy and physiological motion to produce a phantom that is appropriate for fetal MRI sequence development and optimization.
More Related Videos
08:59Use of a Multi-compartment Dynamic Single Enzyme Phantom for Studies of Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Agents
Published on: April 15, 2016
07:57Viscoelastic Characterization of Soft Tissue-Mimicking Gelatin Phantoms using Indentation and Magnetic Resonance Elastography
Published on: May 10, 2022
Related Concept Videos
07:59Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
08:59Use of a Multi-compartment Dynamic Single Enzyme Phantom for Studies of Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Agents
07:57Viscoelastic Characterization of Soft Tissue-Mimicking Gelatin Phantoms using Indentation and Magnetic Resonance Elastography
04:54A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging
06:56Human Fetal Blood Flow Quantification with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Motion Compensation
10:22Fabrication and Characterization of Optical Tissue Phantoms Containing Macrostructure