Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Comparative Effects of High-Tech Visual Scene Displays and Low-Tech Isolated Picture Symbols on Engagement From
Christine Holyfield1, Sydney Brooks2, Allison Schluterman2
1Department of Rehabilitation, Human Resources, and Communication Disorders, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
Abstract:
Purpose Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is an intervention approach that can promote communication and language in children with multiple disabilities who are beginning communicators. While a wide range of AAC technologies are available, little is known about the comparative effects of specific technology options. Given that engagement can be low for beginning communicators with multiple disabilities, the current study provides initial information about the comparative effects of 2 AAC technology options-high-tech visual scene displays (VSDs) and low-tech isolated picture symbols-on engagement. Method Three elementary-age beginning communicators with multiple disabilities participated. The study used a single-subject, alternating treatment design with each technology serving as a condition. Participants interacted with their school speech-language pathologists using each of the 2 technologies across 5 sessions in a block randomized order. Results According to visual analysis and nonoverlap of all pairs calculations, all 3 participants demonstrated more engagement with the high-tech VSDs than the low-tech isolated picture symbols as measured by their seconds of gaze toward each technology option. Despite the difference in engagement observed, there was no clear difference across the 2 conditions in engagement toward the communication partner or use of the AAC. Conclusions Clinicians can consider measuring engagement when evaluating AAC technology options for children with multiple disabilities and should consider evaluating high-tech VSDs as 1 technology option for them. Future research must explore the extent to which differences in engagement to particular AAC technologies result in differences in communication and language learning over time as might be expected.
Related Concept Videos
11:35The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
08:11Measuring Progressive Neurological Disability in a Mouse Model of Multiple Sclerosis
04:39Caenorhabditis Sieve: A Low-tech Instrument and Methodology for Sorting Small Multicellular Organisms
13:57Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Lewis Symbols and the Octet Rule

