Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
Published on: December 20, 2024
Reducing Artifacts in Intracochlear Pressure Measurements to Study Sound Transmission by Bone Conduction Stimulation
Charlotte Borgers1, Guy Fierens1,2,3, Tristan Putzeys1,3
1Research Group Experimental Oto-rhino-laryngology (ExpORL), Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven.
Hypothesis:
Intracochlear pressure (ICP) measurements during bone conduction (BC) stimulation may be affected by motion of the pressure sensor relative to the cochlear promontory bone, demonstrating the need to cement the sensor firmly to the cochlear bone.
Background:
ICP is a promising measurement tool for investigating the cochlear drive in BC transmission, but its use is not yet standardized. Previous ICP studies have reported artificially increased pressure due to motion of the sensor relative to the temporal bone. The artifact can be reduced by firmly cementing the sensor to the bone, but this is destructive for the sensor. Previous studies used a custom-made sensor; the use of commercially available sensors, however, is more generic, but also more challenging to combine with the cement. Therefore, the goals of the current study are: firstly, to evaluate a non-destructive cementing method suitable for a commercially available sensor, and secondly, to investigate ICP measurements during BC stimulation in more detail.
Methods:
To study the effect of sensor cementing, three fixation conditions were investigated on six fresh-frozen temporal bones: 1) alginate, 2) alginate and dental composite, 3) alginate and dental composite, released from micromanipulators. Pressures in scala tympani and vestibuli were measured simultaneously, while velocity measurements were performed on the cochlear promontory and sensor. The ratio between sensor and promontory bone velocity was computed to quantify the relative motion.
Results:
For air conduction stimulation, results were in line with those from previous ICP studies, indicating that baseline measurements were valid and could be used to interpret the results obtained with BC stimulation. Results showed that cementing the sensors and releasing them from the micromanipulators is crucial for valid ICP measurements. When the sensors were only sealed with alginate, the pressure was overestimated, especially at low and mid-frequencies. When the sensors were cemented and held in the micromanipulators, the pressure was underestimated. Compared with the scala tympani measurements, ICP measurements showed a lower scala vestibuli pressure below 1 kHz, and a higher pressure above 1 kHz.
Conclusion:
Dental composite is effective as a cement to attach commercially available sensors to the cochlear promontory bone. When sensors are firmly attached, valid ICP measurements can be obtained with BC stimulation.
Related Concept Videos
04:32Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
09:10Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
Sound as Pressure Waves
The pressure fluctuation depends on the difference in displacements between the successive points in the...
Intensity and Pressure of Sound Waves
Unlike the time average of a sinusoidal term, which is zero since it is positive...
09:30Non-invasive Assessment of Changes in Corticomotoneuronal Transmission in Humans
10:38Human Fear Conditioning Conducted in Full Immersion 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality
