Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
Automated Calculation of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score: Validation in Patients With Large Hemispheric Infarct
Gregory W Albers1, Michael J Wald2, Michael Mlynash1
1From the Stanford Stroke Center, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, CA (G.W.A., M.M.).
Machine learning software (RAPID ASPECTS) accurately identified early brain ischemia in large hemispheric infarcts, outperforming experienced clinicians in assessing computed tomography (CT) scans compared to diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Large hemispheric infarcts require prompt assessment for effective treatment.
- Early detection of brain ischemia is crucial for stroke management.
- Computed tomography (CT) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) are key imaging modalities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of machine learning-based automated software (RAPID ASPECTS) versus experienced clinicians in calculating CT ASPECTS.
- To evaluate the agreement of automated and clinician-based CT ASPECTS with DWI ASPECTS as a reference standard.
- To determine the efficacy of RAPID ASPECTS in identifying early signs of brain ischemia.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of CT and MRI scans from the GAMES-RP study involving patients with large hemispheric infarcts.
- Blinded evaluation of CT and DWI ASPECTS by experienced readers and automated software (RAPID ASPECTS).
- Comparison of CT ASPECTS (clinician median and automated) with DWI ASPECTS using interclass correlation coefficient.
Main Results:
- RAPID ASPECTS showed a higher agreement with DWI ASPECTS than the median CT ASPECTS from clinicians.
- Automated scoring demonstrated a significantly lower median error compared to clinician scoring (1 vs. 3, P<0.001).
- The automated score was more accurate in both full-scale and dichotomized ( <6 vs. ≥6) assessments.
Conclusions:
- RAPID ASPECTS is more accurate than experienced clinicians in identifying early brain ischemia on CT scans.
- Automated software offers a reliable tool for assessing stroke severity using ASPECTS.
- Machine learning enhances the diagnostic accuracy in acute stroke imaging.
Related Concept Videos
10:25Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
TSPO-PET/CT Imaging to Detect Infarct Formation in a Mouse Model of Ischemic Stroke
10:45The Mouse Stroke Unit Protocol with Standardized Neurological Scoring for Translational Mouse Stroke Studies
06:00A Rehabilitation Program of Exoskeleton-assisted Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training with Non-immersive Virtual Reality for Stroke Patients
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
05:52Mobile Game-based Virtual Reality Program for Upper Extremity Stroke Rehabilitation
