Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Dense Connective Tissue01:13

Dense Connective Tissue

11.7K
Dense connective tissue contains more collagen fibers than loose connective tissue. As a consequence, it displays greater resistance to stretching. There are two major categories of dense connective tissue— regular and irregular.
Dense Regular Connective Tissue
In dense regular connective tissue, fibers are arranged parallel to each other, enhancing its tensile strength and resistance to stretching in the direction of the fiber orientations. Ligaments and tendons are made of dense regular...
11.7K
Mutual Exclusivity: How Children Learn the Meanings of Words05:18

Mutual Exclusivity: How Children Learn the Meanings of Words

34.0K
Source: Laboratories of Nicholaus Noles and Judith Danovitch—University of Louisville
Humans are different from other animals in many ways, but perhaps the most important differentiating factor is their ability to use language. Other animals can communicate and even understand and use language in limited ways, but trying to teach human language to a chimp or a dog takes a great deal of time and effort. In contrast, young humans acquire their native language easily, and they learn...
34.0K
Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)09:05

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)

30.7K
Working memory predicts a significant amount of variance for a variety of cognitive tasks, including speaking, reading, and writing. However, few tools are available to assess working memory in children. We present an innovative, computer-based battery that comprehensively assesses different components of working memory in school-age...
30.7K
Measuring Children's Trust in Testimony07:02

Measuring Children's Trust in Testimony

6.7K
Source: Laboratories of Judith Danovitch and Nicholaus Noles—University of Louisville
How does a person learn about the world around them? One way is through direct observation and exploration. However, not every piece of information can be observed firsthand. Instead, a person must often rely on other people as information sources. This is particularly true for children who have so many questions about the world around them, yet have limited means of accessing the answers. Thus, children...
6.7K
How Children Solve Problems Using Causal Reasoning06:23

How Children Solve Problems Using Causal Reasoning

14.3K
Source: Laboratories of Judith Danovitch and Nicholaus Noles—University of Louisville
Imagine a young child hears an adult say, “I want to watch the news,” then watches the adult press a button on the remote control. A moment later, the television screen turns on. The next day, the child wants to turn on the television screen to watch cartoons. How does the child know what to do? Is it enough to say, “I want to watch cartoons,” or is pushing the button on the...
14.3K
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

11.2K
Objective and easy measurement of sensory processing is extremely difficult in nonverbal or vulnerable pediatric patients. We developed a new methodology to quantitatively assess infants and children's cortical processing of light touch, speech sounds, and the multisensory processing of the 2 stimuli, without requiring active subject participation or causing discomfort in vulnerable...
11.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

No Evidence for Curiosity-Driven Information Selection Advantage in Infants' Novel Word Learning.

Developmental science·2025
Same author

Between Two Grammatical Gender Systems: Exploring the Impact of Grammatical Gender on Memory Recall in Ukrainian-Russian Simultaneous Bilinguals.

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

Easy as ABC. Functional-pragmatic factors explain "binding-principle" constraints on pronoun interpretation: Evidence from nine pre-registered rating studies.

Cognitive psychology·2025
Same author

The role of iconicity in children's production of adverbial clauses.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Computational rationality and developmental neurodivergence.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same author

Perception and Cognitive Control in Rationally Inattentive Child Behaviour.

Developmental science·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
09:05

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)

Published on: June 12, 2017

30.7K

Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods?

Samuel David Jones1, Silke Brandt1

  • 1Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Journal of Child Language
|September 11, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Children acquire words with many similar-sounding neighbors more easily. This study found phonological neighborhood density impacts word production more than comprehension in young children.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Speech-Language Pathology

Background:

  • Phonological neighborhood density influences word learning in children.
  • The relative importance of phonological neighborhood density compared to other word characteristics is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of phonological neighborhood density on early word acquisition.
  • To compare the predictive power of phonological neighborhood density against other word properties like frequency, length, babiness, concreteness, valence, arousal, and dominance.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized communicative inventory data from 300 British English-speaking children aged 12 to 25 months.
  • Employed Bayesian regression modeling to analyze word understanding and production.
Keywords:
corpus analysisphonological neighbourhood densityword learning

More Related Videos

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

11.2K
Mutual Exclusivity: How Children Learn the Meanings of Words
05:18

Mutual Exclusivity: How Children Learn the Meanings of Words

Published on: April 30, 2023

34.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
09:05

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)

Published on: June 12, 2017

30.7K
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

11.2K
Mutual Exclusivity: How Children Learn the Meanings of Words
05:18

Mutual Exclusivity: How Children Learn the Meanings of Words

Published on: April 30, 2023

34.0K
  • Assessed multiple predictors including phonological neighborhood density, word frequency, length, babiness, concreteness, valence, arousal, and dominance.

    • Main Results:

    • Phonological neighborhood density significantly predicted word production.
    • Phonological neighborhood density did not predict word comprehension.
    • The effect of phonological neighborhood density on word production was more pronounced in younger children within the studied age range.

    Conclusions:

    • Phonological neighborhood density is a relevant factor in early word production, but not comprehension.
    • The influence of phonological neighborhood density on word production diminishes with age.
    • Findings contribute to understanding the multifaceted nature of early vocabulary acquisition.