Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

An Assessment Method and Toolkit to Evaluate Keyboard Design on Smartphones
Published on: October 5, 2020
Master Protocol Trial Design for Efficient and Rational Evaluation of Novel Therapeutic Oncology Devices
Danielle S Bitterman1,2, Daniel N Cagney2, Lisa L Singer2
1Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Abstract:
Historically, the gold standard for evaluation of cancer therapeutics, including medical devices, has been the randomized clinical trial. Although high-quality clinical data are essential for safe and judicious use of therapeutic oncology devices, class II devices require only preclinical data for US Food and Drug Administration approval and are often not rigorously evaluated prior to widespread uptake. Herein, we review master protocol design in medical oncology and its application to therapeutic oncology devices, using examples from radiation oncology. Unique challenges of clinical testing of radiation oncology devices (RODs) include patient and treatment heterogeneity, lack of funding for trials by industry and health-care payers, and operator dependence. To address these challenges, we propose the use of master protocols to optimize regulatory, financial, administrative, quality assurance, and statistical efficiency of trials evaluating RODs. These device-specific master protocols can be extrapolated to other devices and encompass multiple substudies with the same design, statistical considerations, logistics, and infrastructure. As a practical example, we outline our phase I and II master protocol trial of stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiotherapy, which to the best of our knowledge is the first master protocol trial to test a ROD. Development of more efficient clinical trials is needed to promote thorough evaluation of therapeutic oncology devices, including RODs, in a resource-limited environment, allowing more practical and rapid identification of the most valuable advances in our field.
Insights
Master protocols offer an efficient approach to evaluating radiation oncology devices (RODs) and other therapeutic oncology devices. This strategy addresses challenges in clinical testing, enabling faster identification of valuable advancements.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Randomized clinical trials are the gold standard for evaluating cancer therapeutics, but Class II devices often lack rigorous pre-approval evaluation.
- Therapeutic oncology devices, particularly radiation oncology devices (RODs), face unique challenges in clinical testing, including patient heterogeneity, funding limitations, and operator dependence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review master protocol designs in medical oncology and their application to therapeutic oncology devices, specifically RODs.
- To propose master protocols as a solution to optimize the efficiency of clinical trials for RODs.
Main Methods:
- Review of master protocol designs in medical oncology.
- Application of master protocols to therapeutic oncology devices, with examples from radiation oncology.
- Outline of a phase I/II master protocol trial for stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiotherapy as a practical example.
Main Results:
- Master protocols can enhance regulatory, financial, administrative, quality assurance, and statistical efficiency for ROD trials.
- The proposed master protocol design can be adapted for other devices and encompass multiple substudies.
- The outlined trial represents a novel approach as the first master protocol trial to test a ROD.
Conclusions:
- Master protocols provide a framework for more efficient clinical trials of therapeutic oncology devices, including RODs.
- Efficient clinical trial designs are crucial for thorough evaluation of RODs in resource-limited settings.
- This approach facilitates the practical and rapid identification of significant advancements in the field.
Related Concept Videos
05:42An Assessment Method and Toolkit to Evaluate Keyboard Design on Smartphones
11:16Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
Using Your Head: Measuring Infants' Rational Imitation of Actions
One of the main challenges of infancy is to learn how to achieve one’s goals in the world, whether they are to pick up a toy or to express desires to another person, and one of the most powerful tools in this learning process is imitation. However, imitation is not always as simple as copying other people’s actions; it is also necessary to realize that goals and intentions guide behavior. The...
05:56Evaluation of the Feasibility, Safety, and Accuracy of an Intraoperative High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Device for Treating Liver Metastases
12:42Paramyxoviruses for Tumor-targeted Immunomodulation: Design and Evaluation Ex Vivo
Master Transcription Regulators
