Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.9K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.9K
Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment09:20

Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment

12.5K
Source: William Brady & Jay Van Bavel—New York University
In examining the roles of reason and emotion in moral judgments, psychologists and philosophers alike point to the trolley dilemma and the footbridge dilemma. With the trolley dilemma, most people say that it is appropriate to pull a switch to stop a train from hitting five people by diverting it to kill one person. However, with the footbridge dilemma, most people say it is inappropriate to push a large man off of a bridge in...
12.5K
Frames01:30

Frames

824
Frames are essential components of various mechanical and structural systems used daily. These structures are known for their stability and ability to bear heavy loads. A frame is constructed using two-force and multi-force members, interconnected using pin joints. In contrast, trusses are made entirely of two-force members.
Frames are versatile and widely used in various applications such as structural supports for beams and columns, automobile chassis construction, and in the construction...
824
Frames: Problem Solving I01:24

Frames: Problem Solving I

945
Consider a jib crane with an external load suspended from the pulley. The dimensions of the crane members are shown in the figure. A systematic analysis of the frame structure is required to determine the reaction forces at the pin joints, assuming that the pulleys are frictionless.
945
Frames: Problem Solving II01:26

Frames: Problem Solving II

480
Consider a hydraulic hoist supporting a load of 1 kN. Assuming a simplified schematic representation of this frame structure, the force acting on BD and BF members can be determined.
480
Inertial Frames of Reference01:03

Inertial Frames of Reference

8.6K
Newton’s first law is usually considered to be a statement about reference frames. It provides a method for identifying a special type of reference frame: the inertial reference frame. In principle, we can make the net force on a body zero. If its velocity relative to a given frame is constant, then that frame is said to be inertial. So, by definition, an inertial reference frame is a reference frame where Newton's first law holds valid. Newton's first law applies to objects with...
8.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detection of non-invasive sexing of early chick embryos in intact eggs using laser speckle contrast imaging and deep neural networks.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Inhibition of the PKC-TRPV1-SP axis by propolis ameliorates chronic inflammatory pain in mice.

Iranian journal of basic medical sciences·2026
Same author

Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomal miR-29a-3p Improves Hypertrophic Scar by Inhibiting the Proliferation and Migration of Schwann Cells via the PDGFRB/PAK1 Axis.

BioFactors (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Improving the high initial coulombic efficiency of manganese oxide anodes: a strategy for <i>in situ</i> construction of an interface of metal-organic framework-derived oxide nanoparticles.

Nanoscale·2026
Same author

Qihuang Zhuyu Formula Attenuates Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury by Regulating Autophagy via the NF-κB P65/TRAIL Pathway.

Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening·2026
Same author

YAP promotes wound healing in diabetic mice by improving endothelial cell function via the regulation of SEMA3B.

Acta histochemica·2026
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Framing Effects: Primacy Effect, Recency Effect &amp; Spin Framing
03:26

Framing Effects: Primacy Effect, Recency Effect & Spin Framing

7.9K

Do framing effects debunk moral beliefs?

Kelsey McDonald1, Siyuan Yin1, Tara Weese1

  • 1Philosophy Department, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. kelsey.mcdonald@duke.edusiyuan.yin@duke.edutara.weese@duke.eduws66@duke.eduhttps://sites.duke.edu/wsa/.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|September 12, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Framing effects can significantly impact moral judgments, even if they influence only a few decisions. This study challenges the idea that these effects are minor and do not undermine moral beliefs.

More Related Videos

Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment
09:20

Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment

Published on: April 30, 2023

12.5K
Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Framing Effects: Primacy Effect, Recency Effect &amp; Spin Framing
03:26

Framing Effects: Primacy Effect, Recency Effect & Spin Framing

7.9K
Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment
09:20

Using fMRI to Dissect Moral Judgment

Published on: April 30, 2023

12.5K
Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Moral Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Framing effects, where presentation influences decisions, are well-documented in decision-making.
  • May's research suggests framing effects have minimal impact on moral beliefs.
  • The extent to which framing influences moral judgments remains a key debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the scope and impact of framing effects on moral judgments.
  • To challenge May's conclusion that framing effects do not undermine moral beliefs.
  • To demonstrate that framing effects pose a significant challenge to moral judgment consistency.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of May's estimates regarding framing effects.
  • Theoretical argumentation on the implications of framing effects for moral judgments.
  • Examination of existing literature on framing and moral decision-making.

Main Results:

  • May's estimates of the prevalence and impact of framing effects on moral judgments are likely underestimated.
  • Even small-scale framing effects can have substantial implications for the stability of moral beliefs.
  • The study provides a counterargument to the notion that framing effects are inconsequential for moral reasoning.

Conclusions:

  • Framing effects pose a more significant threat to moral judgment integrity than previously suggested.
  • Moral beliefs may be more susceptible to contextual influences than acknowledged.
  • Further research is needed to fully understand the pervasive influence of framing on ethical decision-making.