Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Pulse Wave Velocity Testing in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Published on: February 7, 2014
Estimation of wave reflection in aorta from radial pulse waveform by artificial neural network: a numerical study
Hanguang Xiao1, Lin Qi2, Lisheng Xu2
1College of Artificial Intelligent, Chongqing University of Technology, No. 69 Hongguang Rd, Banan, Chongqing 400050, PR China.
Background And Objective:
Wave reflection in aorta has been shown to have incremental value for predicting cardiovascular events. However, its estimation by wave separation analysis (WSA) is complex.
Methods:
In this study, a novel method was proposed based on a cascade artificial neural network (ANN) for wave reflection estimation by the frequency features of radial pressure waveform alone. The simulation database of 4000 samples was generated by a 55-segment transmission line model of human arterial tree and was used for evaluating the ANN with 10-fold cross validation for the estimation of reflection magnitude (RMANN) and reflection index (RIANN) of wave reflection in aorta. RM and RI also were estimated by the WSA with a triangle waveform of aortic flow (RMWSA and RIWSA) and with a real aortic flow waveform (RMRef and RIRef) as reference values.
Results:
The results showed the correlation coefficient and mean difference between RMANN and RMRef (R2 = 0.92, mean ± standard deviation (SD) = 0.0 ± 0.02) and those between RIANN and RIRef (R2 = 0.91, mean ± SD = 0.0 ± 0.01) were better than those between RMWSA and RMRef (R2 = 0.51, mean ± SD = 0.01 ± 0.07) and those between RIWSA and RIRef (R2 = 0.50, mean ± SD = 0.0 ± 0.02). As the sample diversity in the simulation database was increased but the total number of samples keeps constant, the advantage of the ANN, though decreased slightly, became more significant than those of WSA (RMANN VS. RMRef and RIANN VS. RIRef: R2 = 0.88 and 0.88, mean ± SD = 0.0 ± 0.05 and 0.0 ± 0.05; RMWSA VS. RMRef and RIWSA VS. RIRef: R2 = 0.24 and 0.24, mean ± SD = 0.07 ± 0.24 and 0.02 ± 0.08, respectively). In addition, the ANN can achieve better results than the traditional method WSA even only two hidden neurons are used.
Conclusions:
ANN is a potential method for the estimation of wave reflection in aorta by a single radial pulse waveform, but further validation of this method in clinic trials is needed.
Related Concept Videos
06:08Pulse Wave Velocity Testing in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Reflection of Waves
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
05:51Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (Cf-PWV) to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
08:07Ultrasound-based Pulse Wave Velocity Evaluation in Mice
