Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Microscopic Replantation of Penile Glans Amputation Due to Circumcision
Published on: June 3, 2022
Infectious Adverse Events Following the Placement of a Penile Prosthesis: A Systematic Review
Joseph Mahon1, Ryan Dornbier1, Grace Wegrzyn2
1Center for Male Health, Department of Urology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL.
Introduction:
Infection remains a prominent concern following penile implantation. Recognition of the risk factors for infection may help to guide surgeons toward reducing the risk of prosthetic contamination.
Aim:
To gain a further understanding of infectious adverse events following penile prosthesis, we performed a systematic literature review.
Methods:
As part of the 2018 American Urological Association Erectile Dysfunction Clinical Guidelines and with the support of the American Urological Association, we performed a comprehensive review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to search for eligible articles published between January 1, 1965, and July 20, 2016, to identify articles reporting infectious adverse events following prosthesis placement.
Main Outcome Measure:
The main outcome measure was infectious adverse events following penile prosthesis placement.
Results:
Ninety-one articles reporting infectious adverse events representing 97 study arms were identified. Prosthetic infection rates ranged from 0% to 24.6% across all series. Inflatable penile prostheses displayed a wider range (0-24.6%) than malleable devices (0-9.1%); the most frequently reported infection rate for inflatable devices was 5% or less. With the advent of device coatings and improved surgical techniques, infectious adverse events have decreased. Infections among diabetic patients also decreased throughout the reviewed body of literature, with the most recent series reporting rates consistent with those of non-diabetic patients. Furthermore, no glycosylated hemoglobin cutoff was found to infer increased or decreased risk of prosthesis infection.
Conclusion:
Overall penile prosthetic infectious adverse events have decreased as surgical techniques have improved and the use of antimicrobial coating has gained in popularity. These advances have demonstrated significant benefits for all patients, particularly diabetic patients who experience infection rates similar to those of non-diabetic patients in recent reports. Further technological advancements for the prevention of biofilm formation is warranted. Mahon J, Dornbier R, Wegrzyn G, et al. Infectious Adverse Events Following the Placement of a Penile Prosthesis: A Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev 2020;8:348-354.
Related Concept Videos
07:28Microscopic Replantation of Penile Glans Amputation Due to Circumcision
12:23In Vitro Selection of Aptamers to Differentiate Infectious from Non-Infectious Viruses
Intraosseous Needle Placement
For unstable patients requiring urgent administration of medications, fluids, or blood products, establishing vascular access quickly is essential. However, there are many factors that can complicate placement of a peripheral intravenous cannula (PIV), and it is extremely common for PIV attempts to fail. PIV placement may be technically challenging in...
Arterial Line Placement
When monitoring patients, it is important to obtain values that are accurate and reliable. Blood pressure monitoring is one of the essential vital signs, and for a majority of patients, measuring it utilizing non-invasive techniques provides accurate values. However, there are situations in which the blood pressure requires more exact, specific, and reliable measurements....
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
