Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:28

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

513
Esophageal perforations manifest in various clinical forms, influenced by factors such as the perforation's cause and location (cervical, intrathoracic, or intra-abdominal), the extent of contamination, and potential injury to adjacent mediastinal structures. The timing between the perforation occurrence and treatment initiation also affects the clinical presentation.
Clinical Manifestations:
513
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:21

Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

811
Individuals with Barrett's esophagus are often asymptomatic, but they may experience symptoms commonly associated with GERD, such as heartburn and acid regurgitation. Additional symptoms can include difficulty swallowing, chest pain, unintentional weight loss, blood in the stool (which may appear black, tarry, or bloody), and episodes of vomiting.
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
811
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management01:28

Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management

378
Esophageal varices often manifest as gastrointestinal bleeding episodes, presenting symptoms like hematemesis (vomiting of blood), hematochezia (passing fresh blood via the rectum), and melena (black, tarry stools). Other signs can include weight loss, anorexia, abdominal discomfort, jaundice, pruritus, altered mental status, and muscle cramps.
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
378
Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:23

Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management

1.2K
The clinical manifestations of gastritis can vary depending on the cause and type of gastritis, but some common symptoms may include the following.
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
1.2K
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management01:26

Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management

446
Patients with esophageal strictures often experience a range of symptoms. Initially, they may have difficulty swallowing solid foods, which can progress to include liquids. Additional symptoms may involve chest pain or discomfort, regurgitating food and fluids, heartburn, unintentional weight loss, coughing or choking during meals, and hoarseness.
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
446
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:30

Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

773
Acute pancreatitis presents a complex medical emergency characterized by rapid onset inflammation of the pancreas, demanding timely diagnosis and management to prevent complications. The condition primarily manifests through severe upper abdominal pain that often radiates to the back. This pain intensifies following the consumption of fatty foods. Accompanying symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal distention, fever, dyspnea, cyanosis, and jaundice can vary in intensity but significantly...
773

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Torque regulation is affected by joint angle during isometric contraction in young male adults.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Observation of tt[over ¯] Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson in the bb[over ¯] Final State Using pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Primary Clarification of CHO Harvested Cell Culture Fluid using an Acoustic Separator
07:06

Primary Clarification of CHO Harvested Cell Culture Fluid using an Acoustic Separator

Published on: May 14, 2020

5.5K

[Implant clarification : Management in clinical practice].

P Bauer1

  • 1Univ. Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätskliniken der MedUni Wien/AKH Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich. petra.bauer@akhwien.at.

Der Radiologe
|September 15, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Optimizing medical implant clarification using patient interviews and databases enhances magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety. This streamlines workflows, reducing costs and preventing adverse MRI-implant interactions for improved patient care.

Keywords:
InteractionsMagnetic resonance imagingResearchSpatial field gradientSpecific absorption rate

More Related Videos

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
01:28

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

513
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
01:21

Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

811

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Primary Clarification of CHO Harvested Cell Culture Fluid using an Acoustic Separator
07:06

Primary Clarification of CHO Harvested Cell Culture Fluid using an Acoustic Separator

Published on: May 14, 2020

5.5K
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
01:28

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

513
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
01:21

Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

811

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Rising numbers of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations and implanted medical devices increase research costs and time.
  • Ensuring MRI compatibility of medical implants is crucial for patient safety and efficient diagnostic procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidelines for optimizing the medical implant clarification process in clinical settings.
  • To enhance the safety and economic viability of MRI procedures involving patients with implants.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current practices for implant clarification.
  • Guidelines incorporating patient interviews and implant databases.
  • Discussion of the technical aspects of MRI-implant interactions and future safety systems.

Main Results:

  • A structured approach to implant clarification can be integrated into clinical workflows.
  • Patient interrogation and database utilization are key to effective clarification.
  • Understanding technical interactions aids in developing safer MRI practices.

Conclusions:

  • Optimized implant clarification minimizes risks of adverse MRI-implant interactions.
  • Integrating this process ensures safe, efficient, and cost-effective patient management.
  • Proactive clarification supports the safe use of MRI in patients with medical implants.