Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
Published on: July 31, 2007
Value-based decision making: An interactive activation perspective
Gaurav Suri1, James J Gross2, James L McClelland2
1Department of Psychology.
Abstract:
Prominent theories of value-based decision making have assumed that choices are made via the maximization of some objective function (e.g., expected value) and that the process of decision making is serial and unfolds across modular subprocesses (e.g., perception, valuation, and action selection). However, the influence of a large number of contextual variables that are not related to expected value in any direct way and the ubiquitous reciprocity among variables thought to belong to different subprocesses suggest that these assumptions may not always hold. Here, we propose an interactive activation framework for value-based decision making that does not assume that objective function maximization is the only consideration affecting choice or that processing is modular or serial. Our framework holds that processing takes place via the interactive propagation of activation in a set of simple, interconnected processing elements. We use our framework to simulate a broad range of well-known empirical phenomena-primarily focusing on decision contexts that feature nonoptimal decision making and/or interactive (i.e., not serial or modular) processing. Our approach is constrained at Marr's (1982) algorithmic and implementational levels rather than focusing strictly on considerations of optimality at the computational theory level. It invites consideration of the possibility that choice is emergent and that its computation is distributed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Related Concept Videos
26:41Perspectives on Neuroscience
07:42An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
Perspectives on Experimental Psychology
Thinking Too Much Impairs Decision-Making
When we are considering a tough choice between two or more attractive options, we often end up actively weighing the pros and cons of each alternative. By reflecting on their advantages and disadvantages, we attempt to fit a complex, subjective decision into an orderly set of criteria. However, research in psychology suggests that this sort of introspective approach might not always yield the most optimal outcomes.1
In...
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Personality
Psychodynamic theorists argue that unconscious...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
