Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Microscopic Replantation of Penile Glans Amputation Due to Circumcision
Published on: June 3, 2022
Patients admitted for treatment of traumatic finger amputations: Characteristics, causes, and prevention
Michael T Larsen1, Ian Eldridge-Allegra1, Jaclyn Wu2
1The Departments of Plastic Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Background:
The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiology of patients admitted with finger amputations in the U.S., as well as to evaluate and propose prevention strategies.
Methods:
The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was queried to obtain data on patients that presented to, and were admitted from US emergency departments for treatment of traumatic finger amputations during the period of 2002-2016. The Haddon Matrix, a framework that can be used to analyze the host, agent, and environmental factors of an injury relative to its timing, was then used to evaluate possible contributing factors of amputation events, and thereby explore plausible prevention interventions.
Results:
From 2002 to 2016, approximately 348,719 people were admitted from the ED for traumatic amputations. The majority were Caucasian and were male. The mean age was 42.3 years old. This was significantly older than those who were not admitted. The top five products responsible for amputations in admitted patients were power saws (40.9% of cases), doors (10.3%), lawn mowers (7.4%), snow blowers (4.3%), and bicycles (2.4%). This list included a higher proportion of powered tools than those with finger amputations who were discharged from the ED with a finger amputation.
Conclusion:
Patients admitted with finger amputations from the ED were older, more likely to be male, and more likely to be victims of powered tools than those that were discharged. Table saws are responsible for a high proportion of the finger amputations that result in hospital admissions. The Haddon Matrix helps us identify factors (host, agent, physical environment, and social environment) to be addressed in prevention strategies. Such approaches might include championing education campaigns, policy measures, and equipment safety features. The effectiveness of such strategies warrants further investigation.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
06:14Chemical Amputation and Regeneration of the Pharynx in the Planarian Schmidtea mediterranea
Published on: March 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
07:28Microscopic Replantation of Penile Glans Amputation Due to Circumcision
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
06:14Chemical Amputation and Regeneration of the Pharynx in the Planarian Schmidtea mediterranea
04:05Clinical Application of Phase Angle and BIVA Z-Score Analyses in Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department with Acute Heart Failure
03:25Ginger Moxibustion, A Non-pharmacological Treatment, for Diarrhea in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
03:10Microscopic Cyst Resection for the Treatment of Patients Diagnosed with Epididymal Cyst