Pressure Recovery in the Left Main Stenosis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Jesper Møller Jensen1, Hans Erik Bøtker1, Niels Peter Rønnow Sand2
1Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus.
Insights
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and CT-derived FFR (FFRct) may not always exclude significant coronary artery disease, even with preserved values. Pressure recovery in specific vessels can mask upstream lesions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Interventional Cardiology
- Diagnostic Accuracy
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis often relies on assessing the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses.
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a gold standard, while CT-derived FFR (FFRct) offers a non-invasive alternative.
- The interpretation of FFR and FFRct can be complex, particularly in cases with multiple lesions or specific anatomical variations.
Observation:
- A 76-year-old male presented with dyspnea, suspected coronary artery disease.
- Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed distal left main (LM) stenosis and indeterminate stenoses in the right (RCA), left circumflex (LCX), and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary arteries.
- CTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct) values were 0.75 (LM), 0.72 (LAD), 0.74 (LCX), 0.86 (ramus), and 0.94 (RCA).
Findings:
- Invasive coronary angiography confirmed LM and LAD stenosis.
- Invasive FFR measurements were 0.73 (LCX) and 0.85 (ramus).
- The preserved FFR and FFRct values in the ramus, despite upstream LM stenosis, illustrate the phenomenon of pressure recovery.
Implications:
- This case highlights that normal or preserved FFR/FFRct values cannot definitively exclude hemodynamically significant upstream coronary lesions.
- Pressure recovery can lead to underestimation of stenosis severity in certain coronary segments.
- Clinical decisions should integrate imaging findings, invasive measurements, and anatomical context to accurately assess CAD significance.
Abstract:
A 76-year-old male patient with dyspnea was referred on a suspicion of coronary artery disease. A coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed a distal left main (LM) stenosis and in the right (right coronary artery [RCA]), left circumflex (LCX) and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary arteries stenosis could not be excluded. CTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct) was 0.75, 0.72, 0.74, 0.86, and 0.94 in the LM, LAD, LCX, ramus, and RCA, respectively. Invasive coronary angiography confirmed a stenosis in the LM and LAD. FFR was 0.73 and 0.85 in the LCX and ramus, respectively. The patient was referred for coronary artery bypass surgery. The FFR and FFRct values in the ramus demonstrate the phenomenon of pressure recovery. This case shows that preserved FFR and FFRct cannot always be used to exclude the hemodynamic significance of upstream coronary lesions.
More Related Videos
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery ALCAPA
Published on: April 24, 2017
06:59Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction