Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

06:08
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
1.2K
Prostate MRI technical parameters standardization: A systematic review on adherence to PI-RADSv2 acquisition protocol
Renato Cuocolo1, Arnaldo Stanzione1, Andrea Ponsiglione1
1Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy.
European Journal of Radiology
|September 21, 2019
Summary
Adherence to Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2) technical standards for prostate MRI is inconsistent among studies. Greater guideline dissemination and potential streamlining are needed for better standardization and clinical applicability.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- The Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2) aims to standardize prostate MRI acquisition, interpretation, and reporting.
- Recent concerns question adherence to PI-RADSv2 acquisition protocols in clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and assess adherence to PI-RADSv2 minimum technical specifications in published prostate MRI studies.
- To identify factors limiting the widespread adoption of PI-RADSv2 acquisition protocols.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search of medical literature databases was conducted for original studies published after January 2016 on prostate MRI.
- Acquisition protocols and patient enrollment data were extracted and analyzed.
- Technical parameters were evaluated against PI-RADSv2 minimal technical requirements.
Main Results:
- Out of 150 included studies, only 5% reported all PI-RADSv2 technical parameters, and none fully met all specifications.
- Overall adherence to PI-RADSv2 acquisition parameters was observed in 19% of studies.
- Lowest adherence rates were found for T2-weighted in-plane resolution (12%), DWI field of view (40%), ADC map low b-value (27%), and DCE-MRI temporal resolution (43%).
- Only 59% of studies followed recommendations for diffusion-weighted imaging high b-value.
Conclusions:
- Adherence to PI-RADSv2 minimum technical standards is highly variable within the scientific literature.
- Enhanced dissemination of PI-RADSv2 guidelines is crucial for achieving protocol standardization.
- Some PI-RADSv2 requirements may need revision to improve clinical applicability and facilitate wider adoption.

