Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026
Temporomandibular Joint Pain Measurement by Bite Force and Von Frey Filament Assays in Mice
Published on: September 13, 2024
Correlation of Bite Force Interpretation in Maximal Intercuspal Position among Patient, Clinician, and T-Scan III
Nitikarn Ruttitivapanich1, Ratchawan Tansalarak2, Jadesada Palasuk3
1Section of Orthodontics, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Objective:
The main purpose of this article was to determine the correlation of bite force in maximal intercuspal position (MIP) among patient's perceptions, clinician subjective interpretation, and T-Scan III system.
Materials And Methods:
Forty-three dental students at Naresuan University (Phitsanulok, Thailand) participated in the study. Subjects were positioned by Frankfurt horizontal plane paralleled to the horizontal plane and asked to bilaterally clenched in MIP. Patient's perception was evaluated by asking which side of the jaw had heavier bite force (right, left, or equally on both sides). Then, the clinician subjective interpretation was assessed using traditional occlusal indicators. Furthermore, patient's bite force was analyzed using T-Scan III.
Statistical Analysis:
Cohen's weighted kappa test was used to evaluate the correlation of bite force.
Results:
The best correlation between patient's perception and T-Scan III was at the ± 7.5% cutoff range with 15 subject agreements. While the best correlation between clinician subjective interpretation and T-Scan III was at ± 5.0% cutoff range with 23 subject agreements. Cohen's weighted kappa indicated slight agreement between T-Scan III and patient's perception and fair agreement between T-Scan III and clinician.
Conclusions:
Clinician subjective interpretation is more clinically reliable than patient's perception when T-Scan III is used as a gold standard.
