Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.4K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.4K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

409
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
409
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

959
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
959
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

1.2K
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
1.2K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

3.6K
Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
3.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Human peripheral nerve xenografts and rat peripheral nerve allografts implanted to the striatum: Methodology and initial findings of cell-based therapy" [J. Neurosci. Methods 434 (2026) 110825].

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same author

Early injury-induced responses in the transected adult human sural nerve.

Research square·2026
Same author

Standardized Pipeline for Metabolism and Cognition in GO-DS21 Mouse Model: Investigating Down Syndrome Comorbidities.

Current protocols·2026
Same author

SEARCHING FOR NEW GENES THAT CAUSE USHER SYNDROME.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Human peripheral nerve xenografts and rat peripheral nerve allografts implanted to the striatum: Methodology and initial findings of cell-based therapy.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same author

Aminoadipate-semialdehyde synthase, a potential target for substrate reduction therapy in glutaric aciduria type 1.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 19, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K

Costs of Implementing Quality in Research Practice.

O Meagan Littrell1, Claudia Stoeger2, Holger Maier2

  • 1University of Kentucky Good Research Practice Resource Center and Department of Neuroscience, Lexington, KY, USA.

Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology
|September 22, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Implementing quality management systems (QMS) in preclinical research improves data quality and transparency. Addressing overlooked costs of quality failure enhances the value of QMS in scientific research environments.

Keywords:
AutomationCost of quality (CoQ)DocumentationGerman Mouse Clinic (GMC)Good laboratory practice (GLP)ISO 9001Quality management system (QMS)Reproducibility

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 19, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Preclinical research
  • Laboratory management
  • Scientific integrity

Background:

  • Growing concerns regarding data transparency and reproducibility in preclinical research.
  • Underestimation of quality failure costs in scientific research, leading to inaccurate financial assessments.
  • Misconceptions about quality management systems (QMS) being burdensome or marginally beneficial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide examples of quality costs in preclinical research.
  • To address misconceptions surrounding the implementation and benefits of QMS.
  • To demonstrate the value of QMS in enhancing data quality and research reproducibility.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of quality costs associated with quality failure in preclinical research.
  • Case studies detailing QMS implementation in European (German Mouse Clinic, ISO 9001) and US (University of Kentucky, GLP) preclinical research settings.
  • Summarization of benefits derived from effective QMS implementation.

Main Results:

  • Quality failure costs in preclinical research are often underestimated and difficult to quantify.
  • Successful implementation of QMS in diverse preclinical research environments (e.g., animal research).
  • Demonstrated benefits of QMS in improving transparency, data quality, and research outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Effective QMS implementation is crucial for addressing reproducibility issues in preclinical research.
  • QMS offers significant, often underestimated, financial and scientific benefits.
  • Investment in QMS supports mutually beneficial outcomes for researchers, institutions, and funders.