Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
Effect of deinstitutionalisation for adults with intellectual disabilities on costs: a systematic review
Peter May1,2, Richard Lombard Vance3, Esther Murphy3
1Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland mayp2@tcd.ie.
Objective:
To review systematically the evidence on the costs and cost-effectiveness of deinstitutionalisation for adults with intellectual disabilities.
Design:
Systematic review.
Population:
Adults (aged 18 years and over) with intellectual disabilities.
Intervention:
Deinstitutionalisation, that is, the move from institutional to community settings.
Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures:
Studies were eligible if evaluating within any cost-consequence framework (eg, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis) or resource use typically considered to fall within the societal viewpoint (eg, cost to payers, service-users, families and informal care costs).
Search:
We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EconLit, Embase and Scopus to September 2017 and supplemented this with grey literature searches and handsearching of the references of the eligible studies. We assessed study quality using the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme suite of tools, excluding those judged to be of poor methodological quality.
Results:
Two studies were included; both were cohort studies from the payer perspective of people leaving long-stay National Health Service hospitals in the UK between 1984 and 1992. One study found that deinstitutionalisation reduced costs, one study found an increase in costs.
Conclusion:
A wide-ranging literature review found limited evidence on costs associated with deinstitutionalisation for people with intellectual disabilities. From two studies included in the review, the results were conflicting. Significant gaps in the evidence base were observable, particularly with respect to priority populations in contemporary policy: older people with intellectual disabilities and serious medical illness, and younger people with very complex needs and challenging behaviours.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42018077406.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
04:13Using a Real-Time Locating System to Measure Walking Activity Associated with Wandering Behaviors Among Institutionalized Older Adults
Published on: February 8, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Intellectual Disability
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Restorative Care
Deindividuation
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...