Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Service- and practitioner-level variation in non-consensual dropout from child mental health services
Julian Edbrooke-Childs1, Jan R Boehnke2, Victoria Zamperoni3
1Evidence Based Practice Unit, UCL and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, 12 Maresfield Gardens, London, NW3 5SU, UK. ebpu@annafreud.org.
Insights
Non-attendance in child mental health services varies significantly by service and practitioner. This variation is not explained by area deprivation or child characteristics, highlighting systemic issues in care delivery.
Area of Science:
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health
- Healthcare Services Research
- Health Services Management
Background:
- Non-attendance at mental health appointments is a significant international issue, costing the UK over £45 million annually in child services.
- Understanding the sources of variation in non-attendance is crucial for improving treatment adherence and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate service-level and practitioner-level variations in non-consensual dropout rates within child mental health services.
- To identify factors contributing to patient dropout beyond demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of routinely collected data from 39 child mental health services.
- Inclusion of 3,622 children (mean age 12.70 years, 57% female) and 896 practitioners.
- Statistical examination of service- and practitioner-level variance in non-consensual dropout.
Main Results:
- Service-level variation accounted for 35% of the differences in non-consensual dropout.
- Practitioner-level variation explained 15% of the dropout variance.
- Children were nearly four times more likely to drop out based on their service and 2.5 times more likely based on their practitioner.
Conclusions:
- Significant variations in non-consensual dropout exist at both service and practitioner levels in child mental health care.
- These variations persist independently of area deprivation or patient demographics.
- Findings suggest a need to address systemic and individual practitioner factors influencing treatment adherence in pediatric mental health services.
Abstract:
Non-attendance of mental health service appointments is an international problem. In the UK, for example, the estimated cost of non-attendance in child mental health services is over £45 million (US dollar 60.94 million) per annum. The objective of this study was to examine whether there were service- and practitioner-level variation in non-consensual dropout in child mental health services. This was an analysis of routinely collected data. Service-level variation (as services covered different geographic areas) and practitioner-level variation were examined in N = 3622 children (mean age 12.70 years; SD 3.62, 57% female, 50% white or white British) seen by 896 practitioners across 39 services. Overall, 35% of the variation in non-consensual dropout was explained at the service level and 15% at the practitioner level. Children were almost four times more likely to drop out depending on which service they attended (median odds ratio = 3.92) and were two-and-a-half times more likely to drop out depending on which practitioner they saw (median odds ratio = 2.53). These levels of variation were not explained by levels of deprivation in areas covered by services or by children's demographic and case characteristics. The findings of the present research may suggest that, beyond service-level variation, there is also practitioner-level variation in non-consensual dropout in child mental health services.
More Related Videos
07:56Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...
Conduct Disorder
Obedience
Parenting Styles
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...