Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.0K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.0K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

484
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
484
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

21.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
21.1K
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

9.4K
The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
9.4K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

292
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
292
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

814
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
814

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laypeople's Perceptions of Clinician Performance Metrics Based on Cancer Screening Attendance.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same author

Women's screening preferences shift after being informed about the 2024 USPSTF breast cancer screening guideline.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same author

Mammography Screening Preferences Among Screening-Eligible Women in Their 40s.

Annals of internal medicine·2025
Same author

Types of HPV Vaccine Misinformation Circulating on Twitter (X) That Parents Find Most Concerning: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Survey and Content Analysis.

Journal of medical Internet research·2025
Same author

Evaluation of how US women react to a decision aid informing them of the harms and benefits of mammography: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Critical Considerations for Using Cultural Targeting and Tailoring in Health Communication Interventions.

Health communication·2024
Same journal

Amplification Chambers and Belief Persistence in Commercial Health Communication.

Journal of health communication·2026
Same journal

User-Driven Fact-Checking Behavior, Motivational Barriers and Expertise Asymmetry in Health Communication: A Large-Scale Online Experiment.

Journal of health communication·2026
Same journal

A Scalability Assessment of an Organizational Health Literacy Initiative to Support Health Professionals in Developing Quality Consumer Information.

Journal of health communication·2026
Same journal

Research Priorities for Readability Assessment of Health Information: A Modified eDelphi Study.

Journal of health communication·2026
Same journal

Misinformation Measures Matter: How Question Wording and Response Options Influence Estimates of Corrections on Social Media.

Journal of health communication·2026
Same journal

Linking Risk Perceptions and Information Acquisition to Preventive Behaviors: An Application of the Extended Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction in Italy and the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Journal of health communication·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 19, 2026

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.3K

An Efficient Message Evaluation Protocol: Two Empirical Analyses on Positional Effects and Optimal Sample Size.

Minji Kim1, Joseph N Cappella2

  • 1Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Journal of Health Communication
|September 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Effective health communication relies on message evaluation. This study validates a protocol using multiple messages and target audience evaluators, finding 25 evaluations per message offer optimal accuracy and efficiency for message testing.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.4K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 19, 2026

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.3K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.4K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Health Communication
  • Message Effects Research
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Reliable and valid message evaluation is crucial for effective health communication.
  • Existing message testing protocols require optimization for efficiency and validity.
  • Anti-tobacco campaign messages are a key area for message effects research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and validate a message testing protocol for acquiring reliable and valid message evaluation results.
  • To provide evidence for the reliability and validity of specific components of the proposed protocol.
  • To determine an optimal number of evaluations per message for balancing accuracy and efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • The study employed a message testing protocol involving multiple messages and target population evaluators.
  • Two secondary analyses were conducted on existing anti-tobacco message evaluation studies.
  • Evaluations of anti-smoking campaign messages by adult smokers were examined.

Main Results:

  • The position of a message did not significantly impact its evaluation, supporting the validity of multiple-exposure designs.
  • A minimum of 25 evaluations per message was found to achieve a balance between accuracy and efficiency.
  • The protocol's components (multiple exposures, sufficient evaluations) contribute to reliable and valid message evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed message testing protocol enhances the efficiency and validity of message evaluation in health communication research.
  • Ensuring sufficient evaluations per message (approximately 25) is key for reliable and valid message effects research.
  • This approach supports the development of more effective health communication strategies, particularly in tobacco control.