Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.2K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.2K
Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

312
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
312
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

234
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
234
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.8K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.8K
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

220
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
220
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

42.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Universal and culture-tuned neural codes for vocal emotion: an fMRI MVPA study using Japanese and Canadian voices.

Oxford open neuroscience·2026
Same author

Browsing Multiple Subjects When the Atlas Adaptation Cannot Be Achieved <i>via</i> a Warping Strategy.

Frontiers in neuroinformatics·2022
Same author

FMRI-based identity classification accuracy in left temporal and frontal regions predicts speaker recognition performance.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

A collaborative resource platform for non-human primate neuroimaging.

NeuroImage·2020
Same author

Single-trial fMRI activation maps measured during the InterTVA event-related voice localizer. A data set ready for inter-subject pattern analysis.

Data in brief·2020
Same author

Effects of beta-ionone on mammary carcinogenesis and antioxidant status in rats treated with DMBA.

Nutrition and cancer·2010

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K

Inter-subject pattern analysis: A straightforward and powerful scheme for group-level MVPA.

Qi Wang1, Bastien Cagna2, Thierry Chaminade2

  • 1Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS - Faculté de Médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, 13005, France; Laboratoire d'Informatique et Systèmes UMR 7020, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Ecole Centrale de Marseille - Faculté des Sciences, 163 Avenue de Luminy, Case 901, Marseille, 13009, France.

Neuroimage
|September 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study compares two group-level functional neuroimaging analysis methods: hierarchical and inter-subject pattern analysis. Inter-subject analysis is more sensitive to smaller effects and aids interpretation.

Keywords:
Group analysisMVPAfMRI

More Related Videos

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
07:12

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time

Published on: July 1, 2014

12.7K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K
Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
07:12

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time

Published on: July 1, 2014

12.7K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning in Neuroscience

Background:

  • Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) is a popular technique for analyzing functional neuroimaging data.
  • Two primary group-level strategies exist: hierarchical analysis and inter-subject pattern analysis.
  • Hierarchical analysis combines within-subject decoding results at a second level.
  • Inter-subject pattern analysis operates directly at the group level, often using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a comprehensive comparison of hierarchical and inter-subject pattern analysis for group-level neuroimaging decoding.
  • To evaluate the performance of these methods under varying conditions of effect size and inter-individual variability.
  • To assess the interpretability and sensitivity of each approach.

Main Methods:

  • Parametric control of multivariate effect size and inter-individual variability in artificial datasets.
  • Application of both hierarchical and inter-subject pattern analysis to simulated data.
  • Validation using two real functional MRI (fMRI) datasets with 15 and 39 subjects.
  • Open availability of core source code and data for reproducibility.

Main Results:

  • Distinct significant regions were identified by the two group-level decoding strategies, with some overlap.
  • Inter-subject pattern analysis demonstrated superior ability to detect smaller effects compared to the hierarchical approach.
  • Inter-subject pattern analysis facilitated clearer interpretation of the results.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of group-level MVPA strategy impacts the identified brain regions and sensitivity.
  • Inter-subject pattern analysis offers advantages in detecting subtle effects and improving interpretability in neuroimaging studies.
  • Open science practices, including data and code sharing, enhance the reproducibility of these findings.