Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Optimized Sealing Process and Real-Time Monitoring of Glass-to-Metal Seal Structures
Published on: September 2, 2019
Testing Mechanical Properties of Rock Bolt under Different Supports Using Fiber Bragg Grating Technology
Xinxin Guo1,2, Bo Wang3,4, Zhenwang Ma5,6
1Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China. zj_gxinxin@my.swjtu.edu.cn.
Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors monitor rock bolt axial forces. Prestressed anchors require active loading, while non-prestressed anchors need passive loading for accurate strain measurement, especially at lower forces.
Area of Science:
- Geotechnical Engineering
- Materials Science
- Sensor Technology
Background:
- Rock bolt anchoring is crucial for ground support in civil and mining engineering.
- Accurate monitoring of axial forces in rock bolts is essential for structural integrity and safety.
- Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors offer a compact and precise method for strain measurement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the axial force variations in prestressed and non-prestressed rock bolt anchors under different loading modes.
- To determine the optimal loading modes (active vs. passive) for FBG sensor-based monitoring of rock bolt anchors.
- To analyze the influence of loading conditions and anchor type on the axial force distribution within the rock bolt shaft.
Main Methods:
- Design and implementation of active and passive loading modes to simulate different anchoring mechanisms.
- Integration of Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors onto rock bolt shafts for real-time axial force monitoring.
- Conducting pullout tests on prestressed and non-prestressed anchors under controlled loading conditions.
Main Results:
- For small anchoring forces (<35 kN), prestressed anchors are best monitored using active loading, and non-prestressed anchors using passive loading.
- For prestressed anchors, axial force distribution along the bolt shaft is nearly uniform (<10% variation).
- Non-prestressed anchors show significant axial force variation near the plate (<15 kN), decreasing with increased load (>20 kN).
Conclusions:
- FBG sensor technology effectively monitors axial forces in rock bolts under various loading conditions.
- The choice of loading mode is critical for accurate FBG-based force assessment, particularly for low-force scenarios.
- Understanding the axial force distribution in non-prestressed anchors is vital for interpreting sensor data near the plate area.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Characteristics of Steel
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used...
Non-destructive Tests for Concrete Strength
Measurements of Strain
Fiber Reinforced Concrete
Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen...

