Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

An Efficient Single—Person Technique for Milk Sampling from Laboratory Mice
Published on: March 28, 2025
Inclusion of herdmate data improves genomic prediction for milk-production and feed-efficiency traits within North
1Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
Abstract:
Genomic data are widely available in the dairy industry and provide a cost-effective means of predicting genetic merit to inform selection decisions and increase genetic gains. As more dairy farms adopt genomic selection practices, dairy producers will soon have genomic data available on all of the animals within their herds. This is a very rich, but currently underused, source of information. Herdmates provide an excellent indication of how a selection candidate's genetics will perform within a given herd, noting that herdmates often include close relatives that share a similar environment. The study objective was to evaluate the utility of incorporating herdmate data into genomic predictions in a data set composed of 3,303 Holsteins from one herd in Canada and 6 herds throughout the United States. Within-herd prediction accuracy was assessed for milk-production and feed-efficiency traits determined from genomic best linear unbiased prediction under 4 different scenarios. Scenario 1 did not include herdmates in the training population. Scenarios 2 through 4 included herdmates in the training population, and scenarios 3 and 4 also included modeling of herd-specific marker effects. Leave-one-out cross validation was used to maximize the number of herdmates in the training population in scenarios 2 through 4, while maintaining constant training population size with scenario 1. Results from the present study reveal the importance of incorporating herdmate data into genomic evaluations. Inclusion of herdmates in the training population improved mean within-herd prediction accuracy for milk-production traits (± standard error) by 0.08 ± 0.03 (milk yield), 0.07 ± 0.03 (fat percentage), and 0.05 ± 0.01 (protein percentage) and feed-efficiency traits by 0.07 ± 0.02 (milk energy), 0.03 ± 0.02 (DMI), and 0.08 ± 0.01 (metabolic body weight). Modeling herd-specific marker effects further improved mean within-herd prediction accuracy for milk yield and energy by 0.03 ± 0.01 and 0.02 ± 0.01, respectively. Herds with higher within-herd heritability and low genomic correlation with the remaining herds benefitted most from the inclusion of herdmate data.
More Related Videos
09:09Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
11:02The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015