Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

539
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
539
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.4K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.4K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

259.0K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
259.0K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.8K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.8K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

65.0K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
65.0K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

21.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
21.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A responsible authorship culture is needed and it is a collective responsibility.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

A responsible authorship culture is needed and it is a collective responsibility.

PLoS medicine·2026
Same author

Creating a responsible authorship culture in science: Anchoring authorship practices in principles of transparency, credit, and accountability.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

A framework for assessing the trustworthiness of scientific research findings.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

A survey of how biology researchers assess credibility when serving on grant and hiring committees.

PeerJ·2026
Same author

The Story behind the Science: Preprints of pandemic potential-how bioRxiv and medRxiv brought preprints to the life sciences.

mBio·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.6K

Signaling the trustworthiness of science.

Kathleen Hall Jamieson1, Marcia McNutt2, Veronique Kiermer3

  • 1Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|September 25, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Scientists can improve public trust by signaling adherence to scientific norms like transparency and evidence. Implementing article-level practices such as badging and checklists enhances trustworthiness in scientific research.

Keywords:
scientific integritysignaling trustworthinesstransparency

More Related Videos

Mimicking the Function of Signaling Proteins: Toward Artificial Signal Transduction Therapy
12:24

Mimicking the Function of Signaling Proteins: Toward Artificial Signal Transduction Therapy

Published on: September 29, 2016

7.4K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.6K
Mimicking the Function of Signaling Proteins: Toward Artificial Signal Transduction Therapy
12:24

Mimicking the Function of Signaling Proteins: Toward Artificial Signal Transduction Therapy

Published on: September 29, 2016

7.4K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.9K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Integrity
  • Research Ethics
  • Scholarly Communication

Background:

  • Public trust in science is crucial for its societal impact.
  • Scientists and journals often fail to adequately signal adherence to scientific norms.
  • This lack of signaling can erode trust among peers and the public.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify methods for scientists and journals to better signal adherence to scientific norms.
  • To explore article-level approaches that enhance the trustworthiness of scientific publications.
  • To provide actionable strategies for improving transparency and accountability in research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing practices in scientific publishing and communication.
  • Analysis of potential signaling mechanisms for research integrity.
  • Proposal of specific article-level interventions.

Main Results:

  • Effective signaling requires promoting evidence, transparency, self-correction, replication, critique, and bias control.
  • Article-level interventions like badging, checklists, and enhanced withdrawal information can signal trustworthiness.
  • Improved identity verification and forward linking also contribute to transparency.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing article-level signals is essential for bolstering trust in scientific findings.
  • Journals and authors have a key role in adopting these practices to demonstrate scientific rigor.
  • Enhanced transparency and accountability mechanisms are vital for maintaining public confidence in science.