Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distractor-target interactions during directed visual attention.

L D Zimba1, H C Hughes

  • 1Department of Psychology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755.

Spatial Vision
|January 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global versus local processing in the absence of low spatial frequencies.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistics of natural images.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a prospective evaluation of four bacterial culture media in the routine laboratory.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2011
Same author

Disability evaluation.

Northwest medicine·2010
Same author

Effect of uncertainty on the time course for selection of verbal name codes.

Perception & psychophysics·2006
Same author

Blindness in a case of tetanus.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2006
Same journal

Comment on 'angle illusion on a picture's surface' by Hammad et al. (2008).

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial distance between target and irrelevant patch modulates detection in a texture segmentation task.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Inhibition related impairments of coherent motion perception in the attention-induced motion blindness paradigm.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial-temporal modeling of interactive image interpretation.

Spatial vision·2009
See all related articles

Directed visual attention (DVA) effects are more spatially selective with marked targets. Irrelevant stimuli near the focus cause interference, but this effect lessens with cortical magnification scaling.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Previous research indicated directed visual attention (DVA) effects were uniform across the contralateral hemifield in an empty visual space.
  • The spatial extent of DVA's influence on visual processing remained an area for further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if spatial selectivity of DVA increases when target locations are precisely marked.
  • To examine the impact of irrelevant stimuli and cortical magnification on attentional effects.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a suprathreshold luminance detection (reaction time) paradigm with precuing.
  • Employed luminous markers to indicate target locations in both attended and unattended hemifields.
  • Manipulated marker scaling based on cortical magnification factor (M).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Marking locations in the unattended hemifield caused localized interference (increased reaction times).
  • Multiple marked locations resulted in graded performance costs.
  • Scaling markers by cortical magnification factor reduced these inhibitory gradients, approaching results from an unstructured visual field.

Conclusions:

  • DVA exhibits increased spatial selectivity with precisely marked targets.
  • Irrelevant stimuli near the attentional focus can interfere with target detection, potentially due to spatial interactions within visual cortex.
  • Cortical magnification plays a role in modulating the spatial extent of attentional interference.