Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
How Should We Decide Whether and When Some Care Is Better Than No Care?
Rachel Koch1, John G Meara2, Anji E Wall3
1A general surgery resident at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee, and a research fellow in the Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change.
Abstract:
This case of cleft lip and palate repair by a surgical mission team is common. Low-risk, single-procedure surgical interventions requiring minimal follow-up with substantial quality of life improvement are well suited for this type of mission. However, cleft repair can also be quite complex and require multiple surgeries and other care over time, postoperative surveillance, and speech therapy. These benefits and burdens prompt us to investigate, from clinical and ethical perspectives, whether and when some surgical care is better than none. We argue that, when performing surgical interventions in low- and middle-income countries, mission teams should consider a systems-based approach that emphasizes collaboration, context, and sustainability.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Planning Nursing Care II
Continuing Care
