Mapping child and adolescent self-reported symptom data to clinician-reported adverse event grading to improve

Molly McFatrich1, Jennifer Brondon2, Nicole R Lucas1

  • 1Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Cancer
|September 26, 2019
PubMed

Insights

A new algorithm accurately translates pediatric patient symptom reports into standardized cancer trial toxicity grades. This improves adverse event reporting for children in oncology studies.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background:

  • Clinician reporting of symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in oncology trials is subjective.
  • A pediatric patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument, Pediatric PRO-CTCAE, was developed to capture symptomatic AEs.
  • Standardizing AE reporting in pediatric oncology is crucial for accurate toxicity grading.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a standardized algorithm mapping Pediatric PRO-CTCAE responses to National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades.
  • To enhance the accuracy of AE reporting in pediatric oncology clinical trials.
  • To integrate child self-reported symptom data into AE reporting frameworks.

Main Methods:

  • Two rounds of surveys administered to experienced cancer clinicians across 9 pediatric hospitals.
  • Round 1: Pediatric oncologists assigned CTCAE grades to 101 Pediatric PRO-CTCAE response patterns.
  • Round 2: A larger clinician group examined agreement on select patterns and the influence of clinical context.

Main Results:

  • High clinician agreement (88%) was achieved for 89 out of 101 response patterns in Round 1 (Light kappa = 0.73).
  • Round 2 confirmed high agreement for most patterns, with clinical context improving, not altering, grade assignments.
  • The developed algorithm demonstrates strong reliability for translating patient-reported symptoms into standardized toxicity grades.

Conclusions:

  • A framework for integrating child self-reported symptom data into AE reporting in oncology trials was established.
  • Translating Pediatric PRO-CTCAE responses into clinically meaningful metrics is essential for future cancer care.
  • This approach will guide toxicity grading and improve the quality of AE reporting in pediatric oncology.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacovigilance01:19

Pharmacovigilance

Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
1.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
409
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
650
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data01:17

Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data

Assessing the gastrointestinal (GI) system is a complex process that begins with collecting subjective data. This data, collected through patient interviews, provides crucial insights into the patient's health history, perception patterns, and lifestyle habits, all contributing significantly to GI health.
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
627