Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assembly of Signaling Complexes01:30

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

6.5K
Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
6.5K
Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins and β-barrels01:09

Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins and β-barrels

6.4K
In multi-pass transmembrane proteins, the polypeptide chain crosses the membrane more than once. The transmembrane polypeptide chain either forms an α-helix or β-strand structure. α-Helix containing multi-pass transmembrane proteins are ubiquitous, whereas β-strand containing ones are mainly found in gram-negative bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts.
α-Helix containing multi-pass transmembrane proteins
Multi-pass transmembrane proteins such as...
6.4K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.0K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.0K
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

14.1K
Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
14.1K
Adrenergic Receptors: β Subtype01:26

Adrenergic Receptors: β Subtype

3.6K
β-adrenoceptors have varied sensitivities towards adrenaline, noradrenaline, and isoprenaline. The order of agonist potency is as follows:
Isoprenaline > Adrenaline > Noradrenaline
Neurotransmitter binding to these receptors causes activation of adenylyl cyclase resulting in increased concentrations of cAMP and modulation of calcium ion channels within the cell. They are further classified into β1, β2, and β3 subtypes.
β1-adrenoceptors: β1-adrenoceptors...
3.6K
Generation of Straight or Branched Actin Filaments01:14

Generation of Straight or Branched Actin Filaments

3.7K
The straight or branched structure formation of actin filaments is controlled by nucleating proteins such as the formins and Arp2/3 complex. Formin-mediated assembly results in straight filaments, whereas Arp2/3 protein complex-mediated assembly results in branched actin filaments.
Arp2/3 Complex
Arp2/3 complex is a seven-subunit complex consisting of two proteins similar to actin- Arp2 and Arp3, and five other subunits that help keep Arp2 and Arp3 inactive. When required, the complex is...
3.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural basis of complement anaphylatoxin receptor activation by an immunostimulant lead candidate.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

GLP-1R and GIPR crosstalk modulates insulinotropic signaling pathways.

Cell chemical biology·2026
Same author

Assessing the ligand native-like pose using a quantum mechanical-derived hydropathic score for protein-ligand complementarity.

npj drug discovery·2026
Same author

Orchestrating the signaling-bias at the protease-activated receptor, PAR1.

Trends in cell biology·2026
Same author

Molecular mechanisms of naturally encoded signaling bias at the complement anaphylatoxin receptors.

Molecular cell·2026
Same author

Q&A with Arun K. Shukla.

Cell reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Monitoring GPCR-β-arrestin1/2 Interactions in Real Time Living Systems to Accelerate Drug Discovery
08:21

Monitoring GPCR-β-arrestin1/2 Interactions in Real Time Living Systems to Accelerate Drug Discovery

Published on: June 28, 2019

7.3K

Conformational Sensors and Domain Swapping Reveal Structural and Functional Differences between β-Arrestin Isoforms.

Eshan Ghosh1, Hemlata Dwivedi1, Mithu Baidya1

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India.

Cell Reports
|September 26, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Structural differences between beta-arrestin (βarr) isoforms 1 and 2 explain their distinct roles in G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) regulation. This finding is crucial for understanding biased agonism.

Keywords:
GPCRsantibody fragmentsbiased agonismbiosensorscellular signalingdesensitizationelectron microscopynegative stainingβ-arrestins

More Related Videos

Single-Molecule FRET Imaging for Observing the Conformational Dynamics of Dynamin-Like GTPase Atlastin
10:19

Single-Molecule FRET Imaging for Observing the Conformational Dynamics of Dynamin-Like GTPase Atlastin

Published on: January 24, 2025

998
Parallel Interrogation of β-Arrestin2 Recruitment for Ligand Screening on a GPCR-Wide Scale using PRESTO-Tango Assay
09:03

Parallel Interrogation of β-Arrestin2 Recruitment for Ligand Screening on a GPCR-Wide Scale using PRESTO-Tango Assay

Published on: March 10, 2020

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Monitoring GPCR-β-arrestin1/2 Interactions in Real Time Living Systems to Accelerate Drug Discovery
08:21

Monitoring GPCR-β-arrestin1/2 Interactions in Real Time Living Systems to Accelerate Drug Discovery

Published on: June 28, 2019

7.3K
Single-Molecule FRET Imaging for Observing the Conformational Dynamics of Dynamin-Like GTPase Atlastin
10:19

Single-Molecule FRET Imaging for Observing the Conformational Dynamics of Dynamin-Like GTPase Atlastin

Published on: January 24, 2025

998
Parallel Interrogation of β-Arrestin2 Recruitment for Ligand Screening on a GPCR-Wide Scale using PRESTO-Tango Assay
09:03

Parallel Interrogation of β-Arrestin2 Recruitment for Ligand Screening on a GPCR-Wide Scale using PRESTO-Tango Assay

Published on: March 10, 2020

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Signaling
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Multifunctional adaptor proteins, beta-arrestins (βarrs), regulate G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) desensitization, signaling, and trafficking.
  • The two βarr isoforms (βarr1 and βarr2) often yield distinct functional outcomes in GPCR regulation despite high sequence and structural similarity.
  • The mechanistic basis for this functional divergence remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the structural basis for the functional divergence of βarr1 and βarr2 in GPCR regulation.
  • To investigate structural differences between βarr1 and βarr2 upon interaction with activated, phosphorylated receptors.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized antibody-fragment-based conformational sensors.
  • Employed domain-swapped chimeras of βarr isoforms.
  • Conducted functional assays to assess βarr activity.

Main Results:

  • Discovered distinct structural differences between βarr1 and βarr2 when bound to activated and phosphorylated receptors.
  • Demonstrated robust complementation in functional assays using domain-swapped βarr chimeras.
  • Linked observed structural differences to divergent functional outcomes mediated by βarr isoforms.

Conclusions:

  • βarr isoforms exhibit distinct structures upon receptor interaction, explaining their differential functional roles.
  • Domain-swapping experiments confirm the link between structural variations and functional divergence.
  • These findings are critical for understanding biased agonism and receptor regulation by βarrs.