Relationship between neointimal strut bridge and jailed side-branch ostial area
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Implantation of Human-Sized Coronary Stents into Rat Abdominal Aorta Using a Trans-Femoral Access
Published on: November 19, 2020
Xiangqi Wu1, Wei You1, Zhiming Wu1
1Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Rd, 210006, Nanjing, China.
Insights
A short strut distance in coronary artery stenting promotes neointimal bridge formation. This bridge formation significantly impacts the side-branch ostial area one year after the procedure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Research
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) management often involves stenting complex bifurcations.
- Drug-eluting stents (DES) are used to treat left anterior descending (LAD)/diagonal branch (D) bifurcations.
- Understanding neointimal hyperplasia is crucial for long-term stent patency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between neointimal strut bridge formation and the side-branch (SB) ostial area.
- To analyze outcomes after single DES crossover stenting in LAD/D bifurcations.
- To evaluate the impact of neointimal bridges on SB ostial dimensions at 1-year follow-up.
Main Methods:
- Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided single DES implantation in 64 coronary heart disease (CHD) patients.
- Patients were categorized into neointimal bridge (n=20) and non-neointimal bridge (n=44) groups based on 2D OCT.
- Analysis included clinical, angiographic, 2D/3D OCT, and DES data at baseline and 1-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- Patients with neointimal bridges showed larger neointimal bridge area and smaller SB ostial area (p<0.01).
- A shorter strut distance was associated with neointimal bridge formation (p<0.05).
- Both groups exhibited decreased SB ostial lumen diameter and area post-procedure compared to pre-procedure.
Conclusions:
- Short strut distance facilitates neointimal bridge formation after single crossover stenting.
- Neointimal bridge formation significantly influences the SB ostial area at 1-year follow-up.
- This finding has implications for optimizing stent placement in coronary bifurcations.
Background:
Our study analyzed the relationship between the neointimal strut bridge and jailed side-branch (SB) ostial area in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) who had a single drug-eluting stent (DES) crossover of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD)/diagonal branch (D) bifurcation.
Patients And Methods:
A total of 64 CHD patients with an LAD/D bifurcation treated by optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided single-DES implantation and followed up at 1 year after primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) were enrolled in our study. According to the two-dimensional OCT results, patients were divided into a non-neointimal bridge group (n = 44) and a neointimal bridge group (n = 20). Basic clinical, angiographic, 2D and 3D OCT, and DES results were analyzed.
Results:
The blood lipid levels of the two groups after the 1‑year follow-up were lower than the levels 1 year earlier (p < 0.05). There was a notable decrease in the SB ostial minimum lumen diameter and area directly after pPCI vs. before pPCI in both groups. The diameter stenosis directly after pPCI showed a clear increase compared with the pre-pPCI value in both groups (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01, respectively). The strut distance of the neointimal bridges in the neointimal bridge group was greater than in the non-neointimal bridge group (p < 0.05). A clearly short strut distance of the neointimal bridge was observed compared with the strut distance of the non-neointimal bridge in the neointimal bridge group (p < 0.05). A larger neointimal bridge area and a smaller SB ostial area were found in the neointimal bridge group compared with the non-neointimal bridge group (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01, respectively).
Conclusion:
A short strut distance facilitated formation of a neointimal bridge, which significantly influenced the SB ostial area after single crossover stenting of the SB orifice at the 1‑year follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

