Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026
Author Spotlight: Evaluating Therapeutic Strategies to Enhance Liver Regeneration
Published on: May 24, 2024
Peer review of mortality after hepatectomy in Australia
Claire L Stevens1, Jessica L Reid1, Wendy J Babidge2
1Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Australia.
Background:
The data within the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM) provides a unique opportunity to consider the contributing factors to perioperative deaths as determined by peer review. Consideration of the factors contributing to mortality after hepatectomy can provide greater insight into how deaths can be prevented. The objective of this study was to determine the reasons for patient deaths post-hepatectomy in Australia.
Methods:
ANZASM data from 1 January 2010 to 30 Jun 2017 was reviewed and all deaths following hepatectomy were selected for analysis. Assessors determinations of whether management could have been improved were reviewed, and then classified into groups of significant clinical events using thematic analysis with a data driven approach.
Results:
The study included 88 deaths reported to ANZASM after hepatectomy. The assessors questioned the decision to operate in 23/88 (25%) patients with a further nine (10%) patients insufficiently investigated prior to resection. ANZASM assessors determined that there was a delay in recognising a significant complication in 16/88 (18%) patients.
Conclusion:
Multi-disciplinary decision making is strongly recommended when deciding which patients to treat with hepatic resection. Optimal care post-hepatectomy includes early recognition of complications and enactment of an adequate rescue plan.
