Right pericardial window opening: a method of preventing pericardial effusion

In this study, we aimed to investigate the superiority of right pericardial window (RPW) versus posterior pericardial drain placing for the parameters of pericardial effusion and the postoperative complications at the patients who has undergone cardiac surgery.

Between July and September 2018, 120 adult patients (mean age 50.30 ± 14.61) who underwent cardiac surgery without the necessity of opening the pleura were included in the study. In Group 1, the RPW was opened (n = 60), and Group 2 posterior pericardial drainage tube was placed without RPW (n = 60). Risk factors and postoperative complication were evaluated and compared between the Groups.

Cardiac tamponade occurrence was not significantly different between the Groups (Group 1, n = 0 and Group 2, n = 3, p = 0.079). Postoperative transthoracic echocardiographic controls revealed significant pericardial effusion in Group 2 (6.90 mm ± 13.02 mm) compared to Group 1 (2.30 mm ± 5.60 mm) (p = 0.013). Postoperative creatinine levels were 0.75 ± 0.26 in Group 1 and 0.88 ± 0.36 in Group 2 (p = 0.022). A significant decrease in glomerular filtration rate was observed in Group 2 (102.7 ± 24.5 and 91.2 ± 28, p = 0.019). Postoperative acute renal failure was significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (p < 0.001). Postoperative new onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 4 patients in Group 1 and 8 in Group 2 (p = 0.224). The duration of intensive care unit stay was 36.00 ± 22.31 h in Group 1 and 53.60 ± 59.50 h in Group 2 (p = 0.034). Development of pneumothorax, pneumonia and pleural effusion were not statistically different between the Groups (p = 0.079, 0.171, 0.509).

RPW application is more effective on preventing postoperative complications in cardiac surgery instead of placing drains in posterior pericardium.