Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in patients with stable coronary disease and left ventricular systolic

Adam D DeVore1,2, Eric Yow2, Mitchell W Krucoff1,2

  • 1Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

ESC Heart Failure
|September 28, 2019
PubMed

Insights

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) did not improve mortality or hospitalizations in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with reduced ejection fraction. Further research is needed for other outcomes in this high-risk group.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Heart Failure

Background:

  • Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with moderate to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction is a high-risk condition.
  • The role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in improving outcomes for these patients remains unclear.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% indicates significant impairment in heart pumping function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of PCI in addition to medical therapy for patients with stable CAD and reduced LVEF.
  • To assess the impact of PCI on long-term mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations.
  • To investigate outcomes in a propensity-matched cohort to minimize confounding factors.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of patients with stable CAD and LVEF ≤35% from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease (1995-2012).
  • Exclusion of patients with acute coronary syndrome or severe angina.
  • Propensity-matched Cox proportional hazards analysis comparing PCI versus medical therapy alone.

Main Results:

  • A cohort of 444 patients (222 pairs) was matched based on 24 variables.
  • Over a median of 7 years, no significant difference in all-cause mortality was observed between PCI and medical therapy groups (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.68-1.10).
  • The composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization also showed no significant difference (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.96-1.44).

Conclusions:

  • In patients with stable CAD amenable to PCI and moderate/severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, PCI addition to medical therapy did not improve long-term mortality.
  • PCI did not significantly reduce the composite of mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization in this high-risk population.
  • The impact of PCI on other clinical outcomes in these patients warrants further investigation.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies01:30

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome or ACS begins with a thorough patient history. Notable symptoms include central, crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, neck, jaw, or back, along with shortness of breath, sweating (diaphoresis), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and palpitations.It is crucial to note any history of cardiac illnesses and assess risk factors, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a sedentary lifestyle.During physical examination, vital...
219
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care01:27

Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

Interprofessional care for coronary artery disease includes pharmacological therapy and revascularization procedures.Pharmacological therapy for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) aims to manage symptoms, prevent complications, and improve patient outcomes through various classes of medications:Antiplatelet Agents:Aspirin and Clopidogrel: These medications inhibit platelet aggregation, preventing blood clots, which is crucial for avoiding heart attacks and strokes. Doctors often prescribe these...
215
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care01:28

Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

IntroductionThe management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) aims to minimize myocardial damage, preserve myocardial function, and prevent complications.Initial ManagementInpatient management involves continuous cardiac monitoring, preferably in an ICU, focusing on blood pressure, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels, and urine output. Ongoing pharmacologic management is crucial for stabilizing the patient.Supplemental Oxygen: Administer supplemental oxygen if oxygen saturation is...
220
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care01:29

Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

Managing cardiomyopathy involves addressing underlying or precipitating causes, treating heart failure with medications, and implementing dietary changes and a balanced exercise and rest regimen.Lifestyle ModificationsCardiomyopathy patients should adopt a low-sodium diet to reduce fluid retention and manage heart failure. A personalized exercise and rest plan helps maintain physical fitness without overstraining the heart. Avoiding alcohol and tobacco is essential to prevent further damage to...
343
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy01:29

Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or HCM, is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by asymmetric left ventricular hypertrophy without ventricular dilation. It is more common in men and is typically diagnosed in young, athletic adults.EtiologyHCM is primarily genetic and is caused by mutations in genes encoding sarcomeric proteins. Researchers have identified over 1400 mutations across at least 11 different genes. Among these, the most frequently occurring mutations are found in the...
416
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy01:30

Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Dilated cardiomyopathy, or DCM, is a progressive myocardial disorder characterized by ventricular chamber dilation and contractile dysfunction.EtiologyVarious factors can cause DCM, including hypertension and heavy alcohol intake, which contribute to the weakening and enlargement of the heart muscle. Viral infections, such as Coxsackievirus B, adenoviruses, and influenza, can lead to DCM by causing inflammation and damage to heart tissue. Certain chemotherapeutic agents, including daunorubicin,...
480