Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in patients with stable coronary disease and left ventricular systolic
Adam D DeVore1,2, Eric Yow2, Mitchell W Krucoff1,2
1Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) did not improve mortality or hospitalizations in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with reduced ejection fraction. Further research is needed for other outcomes in this high-risk group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Failure
Background:
- Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with moderate to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction is a high-risk condition.
- The role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in improving outcomes for these patients remains unclear.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% indicates significant impairment in heart pumping function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of PCI in addition to medical therapy for patients with stable CAD and reduced LVEF.
- To assess the impact of PCI on long-term mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations.
- To investigate outcomes in a propensity-matched cohort to minimize confounding factors.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of patients with stable CAD and LVEF ≤35% from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease (1995-2012).
- Exclusion of patients with acute coronary syndrome or severe angina.
- Propensity-matched Cox proportional hazards analysis comparing PCI versus medical therapy alone.
Main Results:
- A cohort of 444 patients (222 pairs) was matched based on 24 variables.
- Over a median of 7 years, no significant difference in all-cause mortality was observed between PCI and medical therapy groups (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.68-1.10).
- The composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization also showed no significant difference (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.96-1.44).
Conclusions:
- In patients with stable CAD amenable to PCI and moderate/severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, PCI addition to medical therapy did not improve long-term mortality.
- PCI did not significantly reduce the composite of mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization in this high-risk population.
- The impact of PCI on other clinical outcomes in these patients warrants further investigation.
Aims:
We sought to better understand the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and moderate or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Methods And Results:
Using data from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease, we analysed patients who underwent coronary angiography at Duke University Medical Center (1995-2012) that had stable CAD amenable to PCI and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%. Patients with acute coronary syndrome or Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III or IV angina were excluded. We used propensity-matched Cox proportional hazards to evaluate the association of PCI with mortality and hospitalizations. Of 901 patients, 259 were treated with PCI and 642 with medical therapy. PCI propensity scores created from 24 variables were used to assemble a matched cohort of 444 patients (222 pairs) receiving PCI or medical therapy alone. Over a median follow-up of 7 years, 128 (58%) PCI and 125 (56%) medical therapy alone patients died [hazard ratio 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.68, 1.10)]; there was also no difference in the rate of a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization [hazard ratio 1.18 (95% confidence interval 0.96, 1.44)] between the two groups.
Conclusions:
In this well-profiled, propensity-matched cohort of patients with stable CAD amenable to PCI and moderate or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, the addition of PCI to medical therapy did not improve long-term mortality, or the composite of mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization. The impact of PCI on other outcomes in these high-risk patients requires further study.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

