Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Fracture behavior of Bi-structure fiber-reinforced composite restorations
Lippo Lassila1, Eija Säilynoja2, Roosa Prinssi2
1Department of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterial Center -TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture-behavior of direct composite restorations made with two different composite-core materials. In addition, fracture toughness (FT), flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM) of tested composites were evaluated.
Methods:
Twenty groups of posterior crown restorations were fabricated (n = 6/group). The groups were made of a 4-5 mm layer of composite-core materials (everX Flow and SDR Flow+) and covered by a 2 mm layer of conventional composite (G-aenial Anterior & Posterior, G-aenial Universal Injectable, Essentia, CeramX, Filtek Z500). Control groups were only made of conventional composites or composite-core materials. Crowns were statically loaded until fracture. Failure-modes were then visually examined. FT, FS and FM were determined for each tested composite (n = 6).
Results:
ANOVA revealed that crown restorations made only from everX Flow composite had significantly higher load-bearing capacities (3866 ± 263 N) (p < 0.05) among all the groups tested. No statistically significant differences were found in the load-bearing capacities between crowns made with different composite-core materials (p > 0.05). everX Flow exhibited the highest FT (2.8 MPa m1/2) and Z500 presented the highest FS values (197 MPa) (p < 0.05) among tested composites. With regard to the failure-mode analysis, crowns that had a fiber-reinforced core material of everX Flow revealed delaminating of surface conventional composite from the substructure layer. While in crowns that had a core material of SDR Flow+ or having only conventional composites with no fiber reinforcement, showed a crushing fracture pattern.
Conclusion:
Restorations combining a fiber-reinforced composite core and a surface layer of conventional composite, displayed promising performance related to fracture-behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Fiber Reinforced Concrete
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Stress-Strain Diagram - Brittle Materials

