Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporomandibular Disorders: The Great Shift - From Gnathology to Neurobiology.

Primary dental journal·2026
Same author

Repair vs replacement of defective composite restorations: Teaching in dental schools in Indonesia.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Removable partial denture teaching in Indonesian dental schools: A cross-sectional study.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

From molecular interactions to clinical potential: Strontium-calcium polyelectrolyte synergy for biomimetic dentin repair and remineralization.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Bridging the gap in implant dentistry education: Perspectives from Malaysia's graduating dental cohort.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

A comparative evaluation of Vat-photopolymerization and PolyJet 3D printers using multiple measurement methods.

Journal of dentistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

12.1K

Performance of zirconia implants.

Nairn H F Wilson1, Igor R Blum2

  • 1Emeritus Professor of Dentistry, King's College London,, London, UK.

Evidence-Based Dentistry
|September 29, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Zirconia implants showed less plaque accumulation but higher probing depths compared to natural teeth over nearly 8 years. While demonstrating good clinical performance in healthy patients, claims of superiority require further evidence.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

2.2K
Multi-material Ceramic-Based Components – Additive Manufacturing of Black-and-white Zirconia Components by Thermoplastic 3D-Printing (CerAM - T3DP)
08:29

Multi-material Ceramic-Based Components – Additive Manufacturing of Black-and-white Zirconia Components by Thermoplastic 3D-Printing (CerAM - T3DP)

Published on: January 7, 2019

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

12.1K
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

2.2K
Multi-material Ceramic-Based Components – Additive Manufacturing of Black-and-white Zirconia Components by Thermoplastic 3D-Printing (CerAM - T3DP)
08:29

Multi-material Ceramic-Based Components – Additive Manufacturing of Black-and-white Zirconia Components by Thermoplastic 3D-Printing (CerAM - T3DP)

Published on: January 7, 2019

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Periodontology
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Zirconia implants are increasingly used as an alternative to titanium implants.
  • Long-term clinical data comparing zirconia implants to natural teeth are limited.
  • Assessing plaque accumulation, soft tissue health, and bone levels is crucial for implant success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare clinical and microbial parameters between zirconia implants and adjacent natural teeth.
  • To evaluate peri-implant marginal bone levels (MBL) over a mean follow-up of 7.8 years.
  • To assess patient satisfaction with zirconia implants.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, controlled clinical study involving 38 partially edentulous patients with 106 zirconia implants.
  • Clinical parameters measured: approximal plaque index (API), sulcus bleeding index (SBI), periodontal probing depth (PPD), probing attachment level (PAL), mucosal recession (CR/REC), and pink esthetic (PE) scores.
  • Peri-implant marginal bone levels (MBL) assessed via panoramic radiography; microbial contamination analyzed using Paro Check 20.

Main Results:

  • Zirconia implants exhibited significantly lower plaque accumulation (P <0.01) but significantly higher PPDs (P <0.01) compared to control teeth.
  • A 100% survival rate was reported for implants, with moderate mean peri-implant bone resorption (1.2 mm).
  • Higher numbers of 'red complex' bacteria were detected around zirconia implants, though total bacterial counts showed no significant difference.

Conclusions:

  • The study suggests zirconia implants may have good clinical performance in selected, healthy patients.
  • Evidence for the superiority of zirconia implants regarding plaque affinity and soft-tissue compatibility was not fully supported.
  • The ability of zirconia implants to maintain peri-implant hard- and soft-tissue health requires further investigation due to study limitations.