Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

10.2K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.2K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

4.6K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.6K
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials01:12

Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials

1.4K
Statistical software is pivotal in data analysis and clinical trials by providing tools to analyze data, draw conclusions, and make predictions. These software packages range from simple data management applications to complex analytical platforms, supporting various statistical tests, models, and simulation techniques. Their significance lies in their ability to handle vast amounts of data with precision and efficiency, enabling researchers to validate hypotheses, identify trends, and make...
1.4K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

650
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
650
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

5.9K
Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
5.9K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

565
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
565

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automated identification of incidentalomas requiring follow-up: A multi-anatomy evaluation of LLM-based and supervised approaches.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2026
Same author

A scoping review of natural language processing in addressing medically inaccurate information: Errors, misinformation, and hallucination.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2025
Same author

BioMistral-NLU: Towards More Generalizable Medical Language Understanding through Instruction Tuning.

AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science·2025
Same author

CACER: Clinical concept Annotations for Cancer Events and Relations.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2024
Same author

Most people's life satisfaction matches their personality traits: True correlations in multitrait, multirater, multisample data.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

Large language models for biomedicine: foundations, opportunities, challenges, and best practices.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.6K

Cohort selection for clinical trials: n2c2 2018 shared task track 1.

Amber Stubbs1, Michele Filannino2,3, Ergin Soysal4

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Simmons University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
|September 29, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Identifying patients using clinical narratives is challenging. Rule-based and hybrid natural language processing systems performed best in a 2018 challenge, highlighting the need for domain expertise.

Keywords:
clinical narrativescohort selectioninformation extractionmachine learningnatural language processing

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.2K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.6K
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.2K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • The 2018 National NLP Clinical Challenges focused on patient cohort identification from medical records.
  • Accurate patient selection is crucial for clinical trial recruitment and research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate natural language processing (NLP) system performance in identifying patients meeting specific clinical trial criteria.
  • To analyze various NLP approaches for extracting patient data from longitudinal medical records.

Main Methods:

  • Annotated 288 American English clinical narratives for patient eligibility based on trial criteria.
  • Included criteria requiring concept extraction, temporal reasoning, and inference.
  • 47 teams participated, submitting 109 system outputs.

Main Results:

  • The top-performing system achieved a micro F1 score of 0.91.
  • Rule-based and hybrid systems dominated the top 10 rankings.
  • Consulting medical professionals improved system recall.

Conclusions:

  • No single NLP solution fits all patient identification tasks.
  • Future NLP research should address complex inferences, temporal reasoning, and domain knowledge integration.
  • Interpreting clinical narratives requires careful consideration of annotator domain knowledge.