Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
Published on: July 29, 2025
Working memory affects anticipatory behavior during implicit pattern learning
Srdan Medimorec1, Petar Milin2, Dagmar Divjak2
1Department of Modern Languages, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. s.medimorec@bham.ac.uk.
Abstract:
We investigated the relation between implicit sequence learning and individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity. Participants performed an oculomotor version of the serial reaction time (SRT) task and three computerized WM tasks. Implicit learning was measured using anticipation measures only, as they represent strong indicators of learning. Our results demonstrate that anticipatory behavior in the SRT task changes as a function of WM capacity, such that it increases with decreased WM capacity. On the other hand, WM capacity did not affect the overall number of correct anticipations in the task. In addition, we report a positive relation between WM capacity and the number of consecutive correct anticipations (or chunks), and a negative relation between WM capacity and the overall number of errors, indicating different learning strategies during implicit sequence learning. The results of the current study are theoretically important, because they demonstrate that individual differences in WM capacity could account for differences in learning processes, and ultimately change individuals' anticipatory behavior, even when learning is implicit, without intention and awareness.
Related Concept Videos
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Working Memory
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory
Information Processing Approach
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

