Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: clinical safety and performance data
Jantine W P M van Baal1, Boris Roszek1, Merel van Elk1
1Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) , Bilthoven , the Netherlands.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) offers treatment for severe aortic conditions. This review highlights TAVR outcomes, noting variations in reported data and the need for standardized definitions in future studies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Severe aortic stenosis and regurgitation pose significant risks for surgical intervention.
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) provides an alternative for inoperable or high-risk patients.
- A comprehensive understanding of TAVR's clinical and performance outcomes is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive literature review of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
- To summarize reported clinical and performance outcomes associated with various TAVR devices.
- To identify trends and variations in outcome reporting across existing studies.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search encompassing 204 articles.
- Inclusion of data from 16 different transcatheter aortic valve replacement devices.
- Analysis of reported clinical outcomes (mortality, stroke, pacemaker implantation) and valve performance (aortic regurgitation).
Main Results:
- Frequently reported outcomes included 30-day mortality (0-23%), 30-day stroke (0-14.3%), and pacemaker implantation (0-44.9%).
- Aortic valve regurgitation was the most common performance outcome, typically assessed at 7-day follow-up.
- Limited studies reported outcomes beyond 30 days or included intermediate and low-risk patient populations.
Conclusions:
- This review provides an overview of TAVR clinical and performance outcomes, despite variations in reporting definitions (e.g., VARC-2).
- Significant heterogeneity exists in study methodologies and outcome reporting across the literature.
- Standardized definitions for study setups and outcomes are essential for future research to enhance insights into TAVR effectiveness.
More Related Videos
06:59Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
09:57Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Valve Sizing for Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Published on: January 20, 2022