Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Who to screen for hepatitis C? A cost-effectiveness study in Belgium of comprehensive hepatitis C screening in four
L Opstaele1, R Bielen2, S Bourgeois3
1ANZ Medical Writing, Middenlaan 75, 8400 Oostende, Belgium.
Insights
Broad screening for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is cost-effective. This strategy increases detection and treatment of HCV infection, reducing the overall disease burden in Belgium.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Public Health
- Health Economics
Background:
- Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is often asymptomatic, leading to late diagnosis and advanced disease.
- Oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) offer highly effective and well-tolerated treatment for HCV, achieving high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive HCV screening strategy across various populations in Belgium.
- To assess the impact of broad screening on HCV detection and treatment rates.
Main Methods:
- A theoretical model combining a decision tree for screening/diagnosis and a Markov model for treatment was used.
- Belgian data was incorporated, with annual screening rounds over five years (one round for emergency department attendees).
Main Results:
- Comprehensive HCV screening is projected to detect and treat more patients than the current approach.
- Cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was below €10,000 across all evaluated populations and screening frequencies.
Conclusions:
- A broad screening strategy, coupled with treatment, is a cost-effective method for managing HCV in Belgium.
- This approach is likely to reduce the overall burden of Hepatitis C virus infection.
Background And Study Aims:
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection often causes asymptomatic disease and patients are frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Oral direct acting antivirals (DAAs) are successful in treating HCV with high sustained virologic response (SVR) and excellent tolerability. The aim of this study is to evaluate cost-effectiveness of a broad screening strategy proposing screening to all undiagnosed members of a population (comprehensive HCV screening), in the general adult population, emergency department (ED) attendees, men who have sex with men (MSM) and people who inject drugs (PWID).
Patients And Methods:
We populated a theoretical model with Belgian data. A decision tree model simulating HCV screening and diagnosis was combined with a Markov state transition model simulating treatment. There was one screening round per year during five years. In the ED population only one screening round was considered.
Results:
The model calculated that more HCV patients could be detected and treated with comprehensive screening compared to the current situation. Incremental cost per incremental quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained was lower than 10.000€/QALY for one and for five screening rounds in the general population (5.139 and 5.200 respectively), in ED attendees (one screening round 5.967), in MSMs (4.292 and 4.302 respectively) and in PWIDs (3.504 and 3.524 respectively).
Conclusion:
A broad screening strategy combined with treatment is likely to be a cost-effective strategy to detect and treat HCV infected patients and diminish the HCV burden in Belgium.

