Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026
Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Development and validation of a multivariable risk score for prolonged length of stay in the surgical intensive care
Conrad Wesch1, Kris Denhaerynck2, Ursi Barandun Schaefer1
1University Hospital Basel, Department for Anaesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care, Prehospital Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Basel, Switzerland.
Background:
Chronically critical illness is highly relevant in intensive care units, but the definitions in literature vary greatly. The timely detection of prolonged intensive care unit length of stay could support care planning for chronically critical ill patients.
Aim:
To develop and validate a risk score for predicting prolonged length of stay in the surgical intensive care unit.
Methods:
This single centre cohort study formed part of a nursing-led project in one surgical intensive care unit. We examined the performance of seven predefined predictive factors of prolonged (>20 days) intensive care unit length of stay in adults on the seventh day of stay in intensive care to develop (n = 304) and validate (n = 101) a risk score. Candidate variables (Charlson Comorbidity Index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, minimum plasma albumin, need for anti-infective drugs, time of mechanical ventilation, main feeding method and score on the Sedation-Agitation Scale) were analysed using multiple logistical regression analysis.
Results:
Our risk score assigned different points to the following conditions: Charlson Comorbidity Index >2, minimum albumin <20 g/l between days 1 and 7, mechanical ventilation >14 hr on day 7 and the need for parenteral nutrition on day 7. For a validation data set (n = 101), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.770.87). At a cut-off value of 100 points, the degree of sensitivity was 88%, the specificity 75%, the positive predictive value 53%, the negative predictive value 95%, and the model fit R2 0.40.
Conclusions:
Our model allowed the timely detection of prolonged intensive care unit length of stay with four candidate predictive factors. The timely identification of patients with prolonged intensive care unit length of stay is possible and could influence the person-centred prevention of chronically critical illness and adequate resource allocation. (Trial registration no DRKS 00017073)
