Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage.

G L Murphy, H H Brownell

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
    |January 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Induction and category coherence.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
    Same author

    Categorizing with overlapping categories.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Lung lesions in SCID-bo and SCID-bg mice after intratracheal inoculation with wild-type or leucotoxin-deficient mutant strains of Mannheimia haemolytica serotype 1.

    Journal of comparative pathology·2006
    Same author

    Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: a test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
    Same author

    A genotypically unique Babesia gibsoni-like parasite recovered from a dog in Oklahoma.

    The Journal of parasitology·2001
    Same author

    Thematic relations in adults' concepts.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2001
    Same journal

    Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Ranschburg unrepeated.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    See all related articles

    Object recognition is fastest for highly differentiated categories, not just basic-level ones. This challenges the idea that we always identify objects at the basic level first.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Human Perception
    • Natural Language Processing

    Background:

    • Object recognition tasks typically show faster responses for basic-level categories (e.g., 'car') compared to superordinate (e.g., 'vehicle') or subordinate (e.g., 'sedan') levels.
    • Basic categories are often characterized by shorter names, earlier learning, and higher differentiation, but the exact reason for faster recognition remains unclear.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether category differentiation, rather than just basic-level status, drives faster object recognition.
    • To test if highly differentiated subordinate categories are recognized as quickly as basic categories.

    Main Methods:

    • Conducted three experiments using natural language categories to assess object identification times.
    • Compared response times for basic categories versus highly differentiated subordinate categories (e.g., 'racing car').

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Found that objects are identified fastest as members of highly differentiated categories, irrespective of their level (basic or subordinate).
    • Demonstrated that atypical subordinate categories, being highly differentiated, were recognized as rapidly as basic categories.
    • Ruled out the hypothesis that object identification necessarily proceeds through the basic level before further categorization.

    Conclusions:

    • Category differentiation is a key factor, potentially more important than basic-level status, for rapid object recognition.
    • Findings have implications for understanding how category names function as definite descriptions in discourse and language processing.