Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vector analysis and process combination in motion perception.

H Wallach, R Becklen, D Nitzberg

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |February 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Identity imposition and its role in a stereokinetic effect.

    Perception & psychophysics·1990
    Same author

    Shape constancy and polar perspective.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1986
    Same author

    A limitation of position constancy.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1984
    Same author

    Configurational differences in stereovision.

    Perception·1982
    Same author

    Presence of a platelet aggregating factor in the plasma of patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and its inhibition by normal plasma.

    Blood·1979
    Same journal

    Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    See all related articles

    This study reinterprets Johansson's motion displays, suggesting perceived motion arises from external vector analysis of stimulus conditions, not just perceptual vector analysis. Adding reference points often led to accurate motion perception.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychology
    • Perception
    • Visual Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Johansson's (1950) motion displays have been explained by perceptual vector analysis.
    • This study proposes an alternative explanation based on external vector analysis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To re-evaluate the mechanisms underlying motion perception in Johansson's displays.
    • To differentiate between perceptual and external vector analysis in motion perception.

    Main Methods:

    • Experiments modified Johansson's displays by adding stationary reference points.
    • Stimulus conditions related to configurational change were altered.
    • Perception of motion was recorded under altered conditions.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Adding reference points frequently resulted in veridical perception of motion.
    • Perceived motions from configurational change and subject-relative stimulation can combine.
    • Unitary perceived motions were frequently observed under specific conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • The perceived motion in these displays is better explained by external vector analysis of stimulus conditions.
    • Configurational change and subject-relative stimulation are distinct contributors to perceived motion.
    • The combination of motion cues influences the final perceptual outcome.