Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Phase Behavior of Charged Vesicles Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Solution Conditions Monitored with Fluorescence Microscopy
Published on: October 24, 2017
FCC ↔ BCC Phase Transitions in Convex and Concave Hard Particle Systems.
Duanduan Wan1, Chrisy Xiyu Du, Greg van Anders2
1School of Physics and Technology , Wuhan University , Wuhan 430072 , China.
Researchers explored solid-solid transitions between face-centered cubic (FCC) and body-centered cubic (BCC) structures. Particle shape manipulation was used to investigate transition pathways, revealing that these transitions are primarily first-order, regardless of particle shape.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Crystallography
Background:
- Solid-solid transitions, such as between face-centered cubic (FCC) and body-centered cubic (BCC) structures, are fundamental in nature and critical for technological applications.
- The existence of multiple transition pathways complicates the understanding and control of these transformations.
- Symmetry allows for continuous or discontinuous (first-order) pathways between FCC and BCC structures, but selecting between them remains an open question.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of particle shape on the pathways of FCC ↔ BCC solid-solid transitions.
- To determine whether specific particle geometries can select or favor particular transition mechanisms.
- To elucidate the nature (continuous vs. first-order) of FCC ↔ BCC transitions induced by particle shape manipulation.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing systems with malleable particle valence to induce FCC ↔ BCC transitions.
- Employing particle shape engineering (both convex and concave) as a means to control and study transition mechanisms.
- Analyzing the resulting crystal structures and transition characteristics.
Main Results:
- Particle shape modification can influence the presence of metastable hexagonal close-packed (HCP) stacking faults.
- Despite variations in particle shape, all investigated transitions between FCC and BCC structures were found to be first-order.
- The study demonstrates that particle shape does not enable the selection of continuous transition pathways over first-order ones.
Conclusions:
- The nature of FCC ↔ BCC solid-solid transitions is predominantly first-order, irrespective of particle geometry.
- While particle shape can affect intermediate structures like stacking faults, it does not fundamentally alter the transition mechanism to favor continuous pathways.
- This finding has implications for designing materials with predictable solid-state transformations.
Related Concept Videos
Phase Transitions: Melting and Freezing
Phase Transitions
Phase Transitions: Sublimation and Deposition
Phase Transitions: Vaporization and Condensation
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Equilibrium Conditions for a Particle
To understand the concept of equilibrium, let us first consider the forces acting on an object. When different forces act on an object, they can...

